Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27151595›Full record

ArticleIntegrative cancer therapies2016

Perioperative Rehabilitation in Operable Lung Cancer Patients (PROLUCA): A Feasibility Study.

Maja S Sommer, Karen Trier, Jette Vibe-Petersen, Malene Missel, Merete Christensen, Klaus R Larsen, Seppo W Langer, Carsten Hendriksen, Paul Frost Clementsen, Jesper H Pedersen and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative cancer therapies, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Preoperative exercise training for patients with non-small cell lung cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity and Microbiota: Which Impact on Lung Cancer?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maja S SommerCopenhagen Centre for Cancer and Health, City of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark mss@kraeftcenter-kbh.dk.
Karen TrierCopenhagen Centre for Cancer and Health, City of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jette Vibe-PetersenCopenhagen Centre for Cancer and Health, City of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Malene MisselUniversity of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Merete ChristensenUniversity of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Klaus R LarsenBispebjerg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Seppo W LangerUniversity of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Carsten HendriksenUniversity of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Paul Frost ClementsenUniversity of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jesper H PedersenUniversity of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Henning LangbergUniversity of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKBispebjerg Hospital · DKGentofte Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Surgical resection in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may be associated with significant morbidity, functional limitations, and decreased quality of life. Objectives The safety and feasibility of a preoperative and early postoperative rehabilitation program in patients operated for NSCLC was determined in a nonhospital setting, with focus on high-intensity interval exercise. Methods Forty patients with biopsy-proven NSCLC stages I to IIIa referred for surgical resection at the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery RT, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups (3 intervention groups and 1 control group). The preoperative intervention consisted of a home-based exercise program, while the postoperative exercise program comprised a supervised group exercise program involving resistance and high-intensity interval cardiorespiratory exercise 2 hours weekly for 12 weeks combined with individual counseling. The study endpoints were inclusion rate, adherence, and number of adverse events. Results Forty patients (of 124 screened; 32%) were included and randomized into the 4 groups. The postoperative exercise was completed by 73% of the patients randomized to this intervention. No adverse events were observed, indicating that the early postoperative exercise program is safe. The preoperative home-based exercise program was not feasible due to interfering diagnostic procedures and fast-track surgery that left only 1 to 2 weeks between diagnosis and surgery. Conclusion The early postoperative exercise program for patients with NSCLC was safe and feasible, but in a fast-track set up, a preoperative home-based exercise program was not feasible for this population.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungExerciseExercise TherapyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPerioperative PeriodQuality of Lifeexerciselung cancerNSCLCperioperative interventionrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID27151595
PMCPMC5739160
OpenAlexW2346129965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.