Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27151459›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2016

The human motor neuron pools receive a dominant slow-varying common synaptic input.

Francesco Negro, Utku Şükrü Yavuz, Dario Farina

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Mental tasks induce common modulations of oscillations in cortex and spinal cord.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Voluntary Dissociation of Motor Unit Activity in the Vastii Muscles.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francesco NegroInstitute of Neurorehabilitation Systems, Bernstein Focus Neurotechnology Göttingen, Bernstein Centre for Computational Neuroscience, University Medical Centre Göttingen, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany.
Utku Şükrü YavuzDepartment of Orthobionics, Georg-August University Göttingen, Germany.
Dario FarinaInstitute of Neurorehabilitation Systems, Bernstein Focus Neurotechnology Göttingen, Bernstein Centre for Computational Neuroscience, University Medical Centre Göttingen, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany. dario.farina@bccn.uni-goettingen.de.
Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Göttingen · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key pointsMotor neurons in a pool receive both common and independent synaptic inputs, although the proportion and role of their common synaptic input is debated. Classic correlation techniques between motor unit spike trains do not measure the absolute proportion of common input and have limitations as a result of the non-linearity of motor neurons. We propose a method that for the first time allows an accurate quantification of the absolute proportion of low frequency common synaptic input (<5 Hz) to motor neurons in humans. We applied the proposed method to three human muscles and determined experimentally that they receive a similar large amount (>60%) of common input, irrespective of their different functional and control properties. These results increase our knowledge about the role of common and independent input to motor neurons in force control. ABSTRACT: Motor neurons receive both common and independent synaptic inputs. This observation is classically based on the presence of a significant correlation between pairs of motor unit spike trains. The functional significance of different relative proportions of common input across muscles, individuals and conditions is still debated. One of the limitations in our understanding of correlated input to motor neurons is that it has not been possible so far to quantify the absolute proportion of common input with respect to the total synaptic input received by the motor neurons. Indeed, correlation measures of pairs of output spike trains only allow for relative comparisons. In the present study, we report for the first time an approach for measuring the proportion of common input in the low frequency bandwidth (<5 Hz) to a motor neuron pool in humans. This estimate is based on a phenomenological model and the theoretical fitting of the experimental values of coherence between the permutations of groups of motor unit spike trains. We demonstrate the validity of this theoretical estimate with several simulations. Moreover, we applied this method to three human muscles: the abductor digiti minimi, tibialis anterior and vastus medialis. Despite these muscles having different functional roles and control properties, as confirmed by the results of the present study, we estimate that their motor pools receive a similar and large (>60%) proportion of common low frequency oscillations with respect to their total synaptic input. These results suggest that the central nervous system provides a large amount of common input to motor neuron pools, in a similar way to that for muscles with different functional and control properties.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAdultComputer SimulationElectromyographyHumansMaleModels, NeurologicalMotor NeuronsMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalSynapsesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27151459
PMCPMC5043036
OpenAlexW2346981077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.