Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27151429›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology2016

Who benefits from chemoradiation in stage III-IVA endometrial cancer? An analysis of the National Cancer Data Base.

Nataniel H Lester-Coll, Henry S Park, Charles E Rutter, Christopher D Corso, Melissa R Young, Elena S Ratner, Babak Litkouhi, Roy H Decker, James B Yu, Shari Damast

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nataniel H Lester-CollDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States. Electronic address: nataniel.lester-coll@yale.edu.
Henry S ParkDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
Charles E RutterDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
Christopher D CorsoDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
Melissa R YoungDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
Elena S RatnerDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
Babak LitkouhiDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
Roy H DeckerDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
James B YuDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
Shari DamastDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
Yale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAdjuvant therapy for advanced endometrial cancer (AEC) is not standardized. We investigated whether regional radiotherapy with chemotherapy (CRT) compared to chemotherapy alone (CT) was associated with improved overall survival (OS) in an AEC cohort and among subgroups by stage and histologic grade.

methodsWomen who received CT or CRT after hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for FIGO stage III-IVA AEC diagnosed in 2004-2012 were identified in the National Cancer Data Base. Multilevel modeling was used to identify covariates associated with treatment selection. OS was compared using Kaplan-Meier estimates, the log-rank test, Cox proportional hazards regression, and propensity score matching.

resultsWe identified 9837 patients, of whom 6358 (65%) received CT and 3479 (35%) received CRT. Median follow-up was 59.6months. OS was higher in patients receiving CRT compared to CT (70% v 55% at 5years, log-rank P<0.001). Controlling for stage, histologic grade, tumor size, age, comorbidity and race, CRT remained independently associated with improved OS (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.57-0.70, P<0.001). When stratified by stage and histologic grade, there was a significant OS benefit for stage IIIA, IIIB, IIIC, grade 2, and grade 3 (all P<0.001), a trend for stage IVA (P=0.06), but no benefit for grade 1 (P=0.91). On multivariable subgroup analyses, these findings persisted, including lack of benefit in grade 1 patients (HR 0.72, P=0.14). These results were further confirmed after propensity score matching.

conclusionsAdjuvant CRT for AEC was associated with improved OS, except for patients with well-differentiated disease, who fared equally well with CT alone.

Indexed as

AgedAge FactorsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansHysterectomyKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOvariectomyTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesChemotherapyEndometrial cancerNational Cancer Data BaseRadiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID27151429
OpenAlexW2358459197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.