ArticleHuman resources for health2016
Health worker experiences of and movement between public and private not-for-profit sectors-findings from post-conflict Northern Uganda.
Article in Human resources for health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Health-care worker retention in post-conflict settings: a systematic literature review.Health policy and planning · 2023Pooled it
- The role of context in strategic human resource management within private hospitals in Ethiopia, compared to public hospitals.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Drivers of retention of the HIV workforce transitioned from PEPFAR support to the Uganda government payroll.Human resources for health · 2023Article
- Public Service Motivation and Determining Factors to Attract and Retain Health Professionals in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Sex and Gender in Research on Healthcare Workers in Conflict Settings: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- "Posting policies don't change because there is peace or war": the staff deployment challenges for two large health employers during and after conflict in Northern Uganda.Human resources for health · 2019Article
- Understanding HRH recruitment in post-conflict settings: an analysis of central-level policies and processes in Timor-Leste (1999-2018).Human resources for health · 2018Article
- Government resource contributions to the private-not-for-profit sector in Uganda: evolution, adaptations and implications for universal health coverage.International journal for equity in health · 2018Article
- Why do people become health workers? Analysis from life histories in 4 post-conflict and post-crisis countries.The International journal of health planning and management · 2018Article
- Health workers' perceptions of private-not-for-profit health facilities' organizational culture and its influence on retention in Uganda.BMC health services research · 2017Article
- Leaving no one behind: lessons on rebuilding health systems in conflict- and crisis-affected states.BMJ global health · 2017Review
- Evolution of policies on human resources for health: opportunities and constraints in four post-conflict and post-crisis settings.Conflict and health · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNorthern Uganda suffered 20 years of conflict which devastated lives and the health system. Since 2006, there has been investment in reconstruction, which includes efforts to rebuild the health workforce. This article has two objectives: first, to understand health workers' experiences of working in public and private not-for-profit (PNFP) sectors during and after the conflict in Northern Uganda, and second, to understand the factors that influenced health workers' movement between public and PNFP sectors during and after the conflict.
methodsA life history approach was used with 26 health staff purposively selected from public and PNFP facilities in four districts of Northern Uganda. Staff with at least 10 years' experience were selected, which resulted in a sample which was largely female and mid-level. Two thirds were currently employed in the public sector and just over a third in the PNFP sector. A thematic data analysis was guided by the framework analysis approach, analysis framework stages and ATLAS.ti software version 7.0.
resultsAnalysis reveals that most of the current staff were trained in the PNFP sector, which appears to offer higher quality training experiences. During the conflict period, the PNFP sector also functioned more effectively and was relatively better able to support its staff. However, since the end of the conflict, the public sector has been reconstructed and is now viewed as offering a better overall package for staff. Most reported movement has been in that direction, and many in the PNFP sector state intention to move to the public sector. While there is sectoral loyalty on both sides and some bonds created through training, the PNFP sector needs to become more competitive to retain staff so as to continue delivering services to deprived communities in Northern Uganda.
conclusionsThere has been limited previous longitudinal analysis of how health staff perceive different sectors and why they move between them, particularly in conflict-affected contexts. This article adds to our understanding, particularly for mid-level cadres, and highlights the need to ensure balanced health labour market incentives which take into account not only the changing context but also needs at different points in individuals' life cycles and across all core service delivery sectors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.