Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27150814›Full record

ArticleFungal genetics and biology : FG & B2017

Transcriptomic responses of mixed cultures of ascomycete fungi to lignocellulose using dual RNA-seq reveal inter-species antagonism and limited beneficial effects on CAZyme expression.

Paul Daly, Jolanda M van Munster, Matthew Kokolski, Fei Sang, Martin J Blythe, Sunir Malla, Juliana Velasco de Castro Oliveira, Gustavo H Goldman, David B Archer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fungal genetics and biology : FG & B, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Hybrid Whole-Genome Sequencing ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Expression ofBiotechnology for biofuels · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Paul DalySchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK. Electronic address: Paul.Daly@nottingham.ac.uk.
Jolanda M van MunsterSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK. Electronic address: Jolanda.van_Munster@nottingham.ac.uk.
Matthew KokolskiSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK. Electronic address: Matt.Kokolski@nottingham.ac.uk.
Fei SangDeep Seq, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK. Electronic address: Fei.Sang@nottingham.ac.uk.
Martin J BlytheDeep Seq, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK. Electronic address: Martin.Blythe@nottingham.ac.uk.
Sunir MallaDeep Seq, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK. Electronic address: Sunir.Malla@nottingham.ac.uk.
Juliana Velasco de Castro OliveiraLaboratório Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia do Bioetanol (CTBE), Centro Nacional de Pesquisa em Energia e Materiais (CNPEM), Rua Giuseppe Máximo Scolfaro 10000, Campinas, São Paulo 13083-100, Brazil. Electronic address: Juliana.Velasco@bioetanol.org.br.
Gustavo H GoldmanFaculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida do Café, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo 14040-903, Brazil. Electronic address: GGoldman@usp.br.
David B ArcherSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK. Electronic address: David.Archer@nottingham.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K01434X/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M012336/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gaining new knowledge through fungal monoculture responses to lignocellulose is a widely used approach that can lead to better cocktails for lignocellulose saccharification (the enzymatic release of sugars which are subsequently used to make biofuels). However, responses in lignocellulose mixed cultures are rarely studied in the same detail even though in nature fungi often degrade lignocellulose as mixed communities. Using a dual RNA-seq approach, we describe the first study of the transcriptional responses of wild-type strains of Aspergillus niger, Trichoderma reesei and Penicillium chrysogenum in two and three mixed species shake-flask cultures with wheat straw. Based on quantification of species-specific rRNA, a set of conditions was identified where mixed cultures could be sampled so as to obtain sufficient RNA-seq reads for analysis from each species. The number of differentially-expressed genes varied from a couple of thousand to fewer than one hundred. The proportion of carbohydrate active enzyme (CAZy) encoding transcripts was lower in the majority of the mixed cultures compared to the respective straw monocultures. A small subset of P. chrysogenum CAZy genes showed five to ten-fold significantly increased transcript abundance in a two-species mixed culture with T. reesei. However, a substantial number of T. reesei CAZy transcripts showed reduced abundance in mixed cultures. The highly induced genes in mixed cultures indicated that fungal antagonism was a major part of the mixed cultures. In line with this, secondary metabolite producing gene clusters showed increased transcript abundance in mixed cultures and also mixed cultures with T. reesei led to a decrease in the mycelial biomass of A. niger. Significantly higher monomeric sugar release from straw was only measured using a minority of the mixed culture filtrates and there was no overall improvement. This study demonstrates fungal interaction with changes in transcripts, enzyme activities and biomass in the mixed cultures and whilst there were minor beneficial effects for CAZy transcripts and activities, the competitive interaction between T. reesei and the other fungi was the most prominent feature of this study.

Indexed as

Carbohydrate MetabolismTranscriptomeAntibiosisAscomycotaAspergillus nigerBiomassCoculture TechniquesFungal ProteinsHydrolasesLigninPenicillium chrysogenumSequence Analysis, RNATrichodermaFungal ProteinsHydrolasesLigninlignocelluloseAspergillus nigerCompetitionDual RNA-seqLignocelluloseMixed culturesPenicillium chrysogenumTrichoderma reesei

Identifiers

PMID27150814
PMCPMC5476202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.