Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27150659›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials2016

Evaluation of the SLOMYCO Sensititre(®) panel for testing the antimicrobial susceptibility of Mycobacterium marinum isolates.

Marion Chazel, Hélène Marchandin, Nicolas Keck, Dominique Terru, Christian Carrière, Michael Ponsoda, Véronique Jacomo, Gilles Panteix, Nicolas Bouzinbi, Anne-Laure Bañuls and 4 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Heterologous Expression ofAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mycobacterium marinum.Microbiology spectrum · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Marion ChazelDépartement de Bactériologie-Virologie, CHRU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Hélène MarchandinDépartement de Bactériologie-Virologie, CHRU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Nicolas KeckLaboratoire Départemental Vétérinaire de l'Hérault, Montpellier, France.
Dominique TerruDépartement de Bactériologie-Virologie, CHRU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Christian CarrièreDépartement de Bactériologie-Virologie, CHRU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Michael PonsodaLaboratoire Biomnis, Lyon, France.
Véronique JacomoLaboratoire Biomnis, Lyon, France.
Gilles PanteixLaboratoire Biomnis, Lyon, France.
Nicolas BouzinbiDépartement de Bactériologie-Virologie, CHRU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Anne-Laure BañulsMIVEGEC (Laboratoire Maladies Infectieuses et Vecteurs, Ecologie, Génétique, Evolution et Contrôle), UMR CNRS 5290/IRD 224, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Marc ChoisyMIVEGEC (Laboratoire Maladies Infectieuses et Vecteurs, Ecologie, Génétique, Evolution et Contrôle), UMR CNRS 5290/IRD 224, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Jérôme SolassolUniversité Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Alexandra AubryCentre National de Référence des Mycobactéries et de la Résistance aux Antituberculeux, Paris, France.
Sylvain GodreuilDépartement de Bactériologie-Virologie, CHRU Montpellier, Montpellier, France. s-godreuil@chu-montpellier.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe agar dilution method is currently considered as the reference method for Mycobacterium marinum drug susceptibility testing (DST). As it is time-consuming, alternative methods, such as the E-test, were evaluated for M. marinum DST, but without success. The SLOMYCO Sensititre(®) panel, recently commercialized by TREK Diagnostic Systems (Cleveland, OH), can be used for DST in slow-growing mycobacteria and for antimicrobial agents recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) for M. marinum DST. The main goal of this work was to evaluate the SLOMYCO Sensititre(®) panel method for DST in M. marinum isolates from human patients and fish relative to the reference agar dilution method. METHODS/

resultsThe reproducibility of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination (±1 log2 dilution) was very good for both the agar dilution method and SLOMYCO Sensititre(®) panel (>90 % agreement). The percentage essential agreement between methods varied, depending on the drug: between 97 and 75 % for ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin, linezolid, isoniazid, clarithromycin, amikacin, rifabutin and rifampin, 74 % for trimethoprim, 72 % for doxycycline, 70 % for sulfamethoxazole, 59 % for streptomycin, 33 % for ethambutol and only 2.2 % for ethionamide. When the agar dilution and SLOMYCO Sensititre(®) panel results were converted into interpretive criteria, the category agreement was 100 % for amikacin, ciprofloxacin, clarithromycin, moxifloxacin, rifabutin, sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim, 98 % for ethambutol and 96 % for rifampin and no agreement for doxycycline.

conclusionsThe SLOMYCO Sensititre(®) panel method could provide a potential alternative to the reference agar dilution method, when DST in M. marinum is required, except for doxycycline.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMycobacterium Infections, NontuberculousMycobacterium marinumAnti-Bacterial AgentsAgar dilution methodAntimicrobial susceptibility testingHuman and fish isolatesMycobacterium marinumSLOMYCO Sensititre® panel

Identifiers

PMID27150659
PMCPMC4858841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.