Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27150582›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2016

Differential expression of conserved and novel microRNAs during tail regeneration in the lizard Anolis carolinensis.

Elizabeth D Hutchins, Walter L Eckalbar, Justin M Wolter, Marco Mangone, Kenro Kusumi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Macrophages orchestrate tail regeneration in lizardsFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth D HutchinsSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA.
Walter L EckalbarSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA.
Justin M WolterSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA.
Marco MangoneSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA.
Kenro KusumiSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA. kenro@asu.edu.
Arizona State University · USQB3 · US

Funding

Developing the Anolis Lizard as a Model of Musculoskeletal RegenerationR21RR031305 · NCRR · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI KUSUMI, KENRO · 2010 to 2011
$413k
Detection and validation of miRNA targets in breast cancerR21CA179144 · NCI · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI MANGONE, MARCO · 2014 to 2015
$354k
Connecting the proteome and transcriptome during regenerationR21AR064935 · NIAMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI KUSUMI, KENRO · 2013 to 2014
$345k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA179144NCRR NIH HHS R21 RR031305NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR064935
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLizards are evolutionarily the most closely related vertebrates to humans that can lose and regrow an entire appendage. Regeneration in lizards involves differential expression of hundreds of genes that regulate wound healing, musculoskeletal development, hormonal response, and embryonic morphogenesis. While microRNAs are able to regulate large groups of genes, their role in lizard regeneration has not been investigated.

resultsMicroRNA sequencing of green anole lizard (Anolis carolinensis) regenerating tail and associated tissues revealed 350 putative novel and 196 known microRNA precursors. Eleven microRNAs were differentially expressed between the regenerating tail tip and base during maximum outgrowth (25 days post autotomy), including miR-133a, miR-133b, and miR-206, which have been reported to regulate regeneration and stem cell proliferation in other model systems. Three putative novel differentially expressed microRNAs were identified in the regenerating tail tip.

conclusionsDifferentially expressed microRNAs were identified in the regenerating lizard tail, including known regulators of stem cell proliferation. The identification of 3 putative novel microRNAs suggests that regulatory networks, either conserved in vertebrates and previously uncharacterized or specific to lizards, are involved in regeneration. These findings suggest that differential regulation of microRNAs may play a role in coordinating the timing and expression of hundreds of genes involved in regeneration.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationAnimalsComputational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingGene OntologyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingLizardsMicroRNAsMolecular Sequence AnnotationOrgan SpecificityRegenerationRNA InterferenceRNA, MessengerTailMicroRNAsRNA, MessengerBrainGene expressionLizardmicroRNAMuscleRegenerationReptileTailTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID27150582
PMCPMC4858913
OpenAlexW2346977341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.