Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27150294›Full record

SynthesisBMJ supportive & palliative care2016

How can we help family carers manage pain medicines for patients with advanced cancer? A systematic review of intervention studies.

Sue Latter, Jane B Hopkinson, Alison Richardson, Jane A Hughes, Elizabeth Lowson, Deborah Edwards

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ supportive & palliative care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Self-efficacy in caregivers of adults diagnosed with cancer: An integrative review.European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sue LatterFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Jane B HopkinsonSchool of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Alison RichardsonFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK Department of Cancer Care, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Jane A HughesFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Elizabeth LowsonFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Deborah EdwardsSchool of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
University of Southampton · GBCardiff University · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamily carers play a significant role in managing pain and associated medicines for people with advanced cancer. Research indicates that carers often feel inadequately prepared for the tasks involved, which may impact on carers' and patients' emotional state as well as the achievement of optimal pain control. However, little is known about effective methods of supporting family carers with cancer pain medicines.

aimsTo systematically identify and review studies of interventions to help carers manage medicines for pain in advanced cancer. To identify implications for practice and research.

methodA systematic literature search of databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and AMED) was carried out to identify studies of pain medication management interventions that involved family carers of patients with advanced cancer, and reported specific outcomes for family carers. Patient pain outcomes were also sought. Studies were quality appraised; key aspects of study design, interventions and outcomes were compared and a narrative synthesis of findings developed.

results8 studies were included; all had significant methodological limitations. The majority reported improvements in family carer knowledge and/or self-efficacy for managing pain medicines; no effect on patient pain outcomes; and no adverse effects. It was not possible to discern any association between particular intervention characteristics and family carer outcomes.

conclusionsCurrent evidence is limited, but overall suggests face-to-face educational interventions supported by written and/or other resources have potential to improve carers' knowledge and self-efficacy for pain management. Further research is needed to identify how best to help family carers manage pain medicines for patients with advanced cancer.

Indexed as

CaregiversMedication Therapy ManagementCancer PainHealth EducationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansCancerCarersEducationMedicinesPain

Identifiers

PMID27150294
PMCPMC5013162
OpenAlexW2346406424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.