Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27150211›Full record

ReviewJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2016

Cancer survivors' perspectives on adjustment-focused self-management interventions: a qualitative meta-synthesis.

Laura Coffey, Orla Mooney, Simon Dunne, Linda Sharp, Aileen Timmons, Deirdre Desmond, Eleanor O'Sullivan, Conrad Timon, Rachael Gooberman-Hill, Pamela Gallagher

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03681821 (Effects of Transtheoretical Model-based Intervention on the Self-management of Patients With an Ostomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03681821 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of Transtheoretical Model-based Intervention on the Self-management of Patients With an Ostomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentral South UniversityRan2012 to 2013Enrolled94ConditionsSelf-management, Self EfficacyArmsTranstheoretical Model (TTM)-based Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Self-management interventions for cancer survivors: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Postradiation trismus in head and neck cancer survivors: a qualitative study of effects on life, rehabilitation, used coping strategies and support from the healthcare system.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Post-traumatic growth 5 years after cancer: identification of associated actionable factors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  11. User-Centered Development and Patient Acceptability Testing of a Health-Coaching Intervention to Enhance Cancer Survivorship Follow-up in Primary Care.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. What is known about the role of rural-urban residency in relation to self-management in people affected by cancer who have completed primary treatment? A scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  15. Prevalence and frequency of self-management strategies among female cancer survivors: the neglected roles of social relations and conscious living.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Laura CoffeyDepartment of Psychology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland.
Orla MooneySchool of Nursing and Human Sciences, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
Simon DunneSchool of Nursing and Human Sciences, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
Linda SharpInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
Aileen TimmonsNational Cancer Registry Ireland, Cork, Ireland.
Deirdre DesmondDepartment of Psychology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland.
Eleanor O'SullivanCork University Dental School and Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Conrad TimonDepartment of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Rachael Gooberman-HillSchool of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Pamela GallagherSchool of Nursing and Human Sciences, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland. pamela.gallagher@dcu.ie.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSelf-management interventions improve patient outcomes across a range of long-term conditions but are often limited by low uptake and completion rates. The aim of this paper was to conduct a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies exploring cancer survivors' views and experiences of engaging with adjustment-focused self-management interventions in order to inform the development of future interventions targeting this population.

methodsFour electronic databases were systematically searched. Studies that used qualitative methods to explore cancer survivors' views and experiences of engaging with adjustment-focused self-management interventions were included. A meta-ethnographic approach was used to synthesize the findings.

resultsThirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Engaging with adjustment-focused self-management interventions enabled cancer survivors to gain emotional and informational support from peers and/or facilitators in an open, non-judgemental environment, become empowered through enhancing knowledge and skills and regaining confidence and control, and move beyond cancer by accepting illness experiences, reprioritising goals and adopting a positive outlook. However, the extent to which they engaged with, and benefited from, such interventions was mitigated by diverse preferences regarding intervention design, content and delivery. Personal obstacles to engagement included low perceived need, reticence to discuss cancer-related experiences and various practical issues.

conclusionsCancer survivors derive a range of benefits from participating in adjustment-focused self-management interventions; potential barriers to engagement should be addressed more comprehensively in intervention marketing, design and delivery. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: The findings suggest some key considerations for the development and implementation of future adjustment-focused self-management interventions that may help to optimize their appeal and effectiveness among cancer survivors.

Indexed as

Self CareHumansNeoplasmsPerceptionQualitative ResearchSurvival RateSurvivorsCancerMeta-synthesisQualitative researchSelf-managementSurvivorship

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.