Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27150186›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Does time off work after injury vary by jurisdiction? A comparative study of eight Australian workers' compensation systems.

Alex Collie, Tyler J Lane, Behrooz Hassani-Mahmooei, Jason Thompson, Chris McLeod

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alex CollieInstitute for Safety, Compensation and Recovery Research, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Tyler J LaneInstitute for Safety, Compensation and Recovery Research, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Behrooz Hassani-MahmooeiInstitute for Safety, Compensation and Recovery Research, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jason ThompsonInstitute for Safety, Compensation and Recovery Research, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Chris McLeodPartnership for Work, Health and Safety, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Monash University · AUUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine whether the jurisdiction in which a work-related injury compensation claim is made is an independent predictor of duration of time off work following work injury, and if so, the magnitude of the effect.

settingEight Australian state and territory workers' compensation systems, providing coverage for more than 90% of the Australian labour force. Administrative claims data from these systems were provided by government regulatory authorities for the study.

participants95 976 Australian workers with workers' compensation claims accepted in 2010 and with at least 2 weeks of compensated time off work. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Duration of time lost from work in weeks, censored at 104 weeks.

resultsAfter controlling for demographic, worker, injury and employer factors in a Cox regression model, significant differences in duration of time loss between state and territory of claim were observed. Compared with New South Wales, workers in Victoria, South Australia and Comcare had significantly longer durations of time off work and were more likely to be receiving income benefits at 104 weeks postinjury, while workers in Tasmania and Queensland had significantly shorter durations of time off work.

conclusionsThe jurisdiction in which an injured worker makes a compensation claim has a significant and independent impact on duration of time loss. Further research is necessary to identify specific compensation system policies and practices that promote timely and appropriate return to work and reduce duration of time off work.

Indexed as

Occupational DiseasesOccupational InjuriesAdministrative Claims, HealthcareAdultFemaleHumansIndustryMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedNew South WalesNorthern TerritoryQueenslandReturn to WorkSouth AustraliaState GovernmentinjuryOCCUPATIONAL & INDUSTRIAL MEDICINEreturn to workworkers compensation

Identifiers

PMID27150186
PMCPMC4861102
OpenAlexW2345588300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.