Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27149620›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Estimation of Uncertainties in the Global Distance Test (GDT_TS) for CASP Models.

Wenlin Li, R Dustin Schaeffer, Zbyszek Otwinowski, Nick V Grishin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Protein Structure Prediction Methods.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wenlin LiDepartment of Biochemistry and Department of Biophysics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, 75390-9050, United States of America.
R Dustin SchaefferHoward Hughes Medical Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, 75390-9050, United States of America.
Zbyszek OtwinowskiDepartment of Biochemistry and Department of Biophysics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, 75390-9050, United States of America.
Nick V GrishinHoward Hughes Medical Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, 75390-9050, United States of America.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY OF MACROMOLECULESR01GM053163 · NIGMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI MINOR, WLADEK, OTWINOWSKI, ZBYSZEK · 1996 to 2014
$6.3M
Computational methods for structural-functional studies of proteinsR01GM094575 · NIGMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI GRISHIN, NICK V. · 2010 to 2017
$2.4M
X-ray data analysis in the presence of structural variability - Administrative SupplementR01GM117080 · NIGMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI MINOR, WLADEK, OTWINOWSKI, ZBYSZEK · 2015 to 2018
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM053163NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM094575NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM117080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Critical Assessment of techniques for protein Structure Prediction (or CASP) is a community-wide blind test experiment to reveal the best accomplishments of structure modeling. Assessors have been using the Global Distance Test (GDT_TS) measure to quantify prediction performance since CASP3 in 1998. However, identifying significant score differences between close models is difficult because of the lack of uncertainty estimations for this measure. Here, we utilized the atomic fluctuations caused by structure flexibility to estimate the uncertainty of GDT_TS scores. Structures determined by nuclear magnetic resonance are deposited as ensembles of alternative conformers that reflect the structural flexibility, whereas standard X-ray refinement produces the static structure averaged over time and space for the dynamic ensembles. To recapitulate the structural heterogeneous ensemble in the crystal lattice, we performed time-averaged refinement for X-ray datasets to generate structural ensembles for our GDT_TS uncertainty analysis. Using those generated ensembles, our study demonstrates that the time-averaged refinements produced structure ensembles with better agreement with the experimental datasets than the averaged X-ray structures with B-factors. The uncertainty of the GDT_TS scores, quantified by their standard deviations (SDs), increases for scores lower than 50 and 70, with maximum SDs of 0.3 and 1.23 for X-ray and NMR structures, respectively. We also applied our procedure to the high accuracy version of GDT-based score and produced similar results with slightly higher SDs. To facilitate score comparisons by the community, we developed a user-friendly web server that produces structure ensembles for NMR and X-ray structures and is accessible at http://prodata.swmed.edu/SEnCS. Our work helps to identify the significance of GDT_TS score differences, as well as to provide structure ensembles for estimating SDs of any scores.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalUncertaintyX-Rays

Identifiers

PMID27149620
PMCPMC4858170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.