Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27149548›Full record

ReviewThe FEBS journal2016

Using CRISPR/Cas to study gene function and model disease in vivo.

Darjus F Tschaharganeh, Scott W Lowe, Ralph J Garippa, Geulah Livshits

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The FEBS journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. TALENs-an indispensable tool in the era of CRISPR: a mini review.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The past and presence of gene targeting: from chemicals and DNA via proteins to RNA.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. A CRISPR toolbox to study virus-host interactions.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. A perspective ofGenes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2017
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Darjus F TschaharganehDepartment of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Scott W LoweDepartment of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Ralph J GarippaRNAi Core Facility, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Geulah LivshitsDepartment of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
VIRAL TRANSACTIVATIONP01CA013106 · NCI · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI William Richard McCombie · 1985 to 2026
$116.8M
TRANSLATIONAL CONTROL IN ADAPTATION TO HYPOXIAP01CA104838 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DIEHL, JOHN ALAN · 2004 to 2018
$17.6M
The impact of chromosome 17p lesions on leukemogeneis and therapy responseR01CA190261 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI LOWE, SCOTT W. · 2015 to 2019
$2.0M
A scalable platform for target validation in GEMM models of gastrointestinal malignancies.R01CA195787 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI LOWE, SCOTT W. · 2015 to 2017
$2.0M
Mechanisms of tumor suppression by epigenetic regulators in pancreatic cancerF32CA177072 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI LIVSHITS, GEULAH YEVGENIYA · 2013 to 2016
$168k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS F32 CA177072NCI NIH HHS P01 CA013106NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA190261NCI NIH HHS R01 CA195787
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent discovery of the CRISPR/Cas system and repurposing of this technology to edit a variety of different genomes have revolutionized an array of scientific fields, from genetics and translational research, to agriculture and bioproduction. In particular, the prospect of rapid and precise genome editing in laboratory animals by CRISPR/Cas has generated an immense interest in the scientific community. Here we review current in vivo applications of CRISPR/Cas and how this technology can improve our knowledge of gene function and our understanding of biological processes in animal models.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsAnimalsChromosome AberrationsDisease Models, AnimalDNA End-Joining RepairEmbryonic Stem CellsEpigenetic RepressionGene EditingGerm-Line MutationHumansMiceModels, GeneticTranscriptional ActivationcancerCRISPR/Cas9disease modelsgenome editingmouse models

Identifiers

PMID27149548
PMCPMC5120361
OpenAlexW2345641884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.