Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27149474›Full record

ArticleMedicine2016

Contrast-Induced Nephropathy After Computed Tomography in Stable CKD Patients With Proper Prophylaxis: 8-Year Experience of Outpatient Prophylaxis Program.

Sehoon Park, Myoung-Hee Kim, Eunjeong Kang, Seokwoo Park, Hyung Ah Jo, Hajeong Lee, Sun Moon Kim, Jung Pyo Lee, Kook-Hwan Oh, Kwon Wook Joo and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sehoon ParkFrom the Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul (SP, EK, SP, HAJ, HL, K-HO, KWJ, YSK, DKK); Department of Dental Hygiene, College of Health Science, Eulji University, Gyeonggi-do (M-HK); Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungcheongbuk-do (SMK); Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center (JPL); and Kidney Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea (KWJ, YSK, DKK).
Myoung-Hee Kim
Eunjeong Kang
Seokwoo Park
Hyung Ah Jo
Hajeong Lee
Sun Moon Kim
Jung Pyo Lee
Kook-Hwan Oh
Kwon Wook Joo
Yon Su Kim
Dong Ki Kim
SMK University of Applied Social Sciences · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conflicting data have been reported on the clinical significance of contrast-induced nephropathy after CT scan (CT-CIN). In addition, the epidemiologic characteristics and clinical outcomes of CT-CIN following proper prophylactic intervention remain elusive.We examined the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of CT-CIN in stable chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients using data collected from our outpatient CT-CIN prophylaxis program conducted between 2007 and 2014. The program recruited patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m using an electronic health record-based pop-up alert system and provided an identical protocol of CIN prophylaxis to all patients.A total of 1666 subjects were included in this study, and 61 of the 1666 subjects (3.7%) developed CT-CIN. Multivariate analysis showed that baseline eGFR, diabetes mellitus, and low serum albumin were significant risk factors for CT-CIN. The generalized additive model analysis revealed a nonlinear relationship between the baseline eGFR and the risk of CT-CIN. In this analysis, the risk of CT-CIN began to increase below an eGFR threshold of 36.8 mL/min/1.73 m. To assess the outcomes of CT-CIN, patients with and without CT-CIN were compared after propensity score-based 1:2 matching. CT-CIN did not increase the mortality rate of patients. However, patients with CT-CIN were significantly more likely to start dialysis within 6 months of follow-up, but not after those initial 6 months.CT-CIN developed in only a small number of stable CKD patients who received proper prophylactic intervention, and the risk of CT-CIN was increased in patients with more advanced CKD. Despite the low incidence, CT-CIN conferred a non-negligible risk for the initiation of dialysis in the acute period, even after prophylaxis.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryAgedContrast MediaCreatinineFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMalePropensity ScoreRenal Insufficiency, ChronicRisk FactorsTomography, X-Ray ComputedContrast MediaCreatinine

Identifiers

PMID27149474
PMCPMC4863791
OpenAlexW2472561972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.