Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27149261›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Optic Disc Perfusion in Primary Open Angle and Normal Tension Glaucoma Eyes Using Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Microangiography.

Karine D Bojikian, Chieh-Li Chen, Joanne C Wen, Qinqin Zhang, Chen Xin, Divakar Gupta, Raghu C Mudumbai, Murray A Johnstone, Ruikang K Wang, Philip P Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed
18.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Optical Coherence Tomography and Glaucoma.Annual review of vision science · 2021
    Review

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Karine D BojikianDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Chieh-Li ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Joanne C WenDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Qinqin ZhangDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Chen XinDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Divakar GuptaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Raghu C MudumbaiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Murray A JohnstoneDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Ruikang K WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Philip P ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
University of Washington · US

Funding

NON-INVASIVE REAL-TIME LABEL-FREE 3D IMAGING OF RETINAL MICROCIRCULATIONR01EY024158 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WANG, RUIKANG · 2014 to 2017
$1.7M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024158
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate optic disc perfusion differences in normal, primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), and normal tension glaucoma (NTG) eyes using optical microangiography (OMAG) based optical coherence tomography (OCT) angiography technique.

designCross-sectional, observational study. SUBJECTS: Twenty-eight normal, 30 POAG, and 31 NTG subjects.

methodsOne eye from each subject was scanned with a 68 kHz Cirrus HD-OCT 5,000-based OMAG prototype system centered at the optic nerve head (ONH) (Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc, Dublin, CA). Microvascular images were generated from the OMAG dataset by detecting the differences in OCT signal between consecutive B-scans. The pre-laminar layer (preLC) was isolated by a semi-automatic segmentation program.

main outcome measuresOptic disc perfusion, quantified as flux, vessel area density, and normalized flux (flux normalized by the vessel area) within the ONH.

resultsGlaucomatous eyes had significantly lower optic disc perfusion in preLC in all three perfusion metrics (p<0.0001) compared to normal eyes. The visual field (VF) mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD) were similar between the POAG and NTG groups, and no differences in optic disc perfusion were observed between POAG and NTG. Univariate analysis revealed significant correlation between optic disc perfusion and VF MD, VF PSD, and rim area in both POAG and NTG groups (p≤0.0288). However, normalized optic disc perfusion was correlated with some structural measures (retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and ONH cup/disc ratio) only in POAG eyes.

conclusionsOptic disc perfusion detected with OMAG was significantly reduced in POAG and NTG groups compared to normal controls, but no difference was seen between POAG and NTG groups with similar levels of VF damage. Disc perfusion was significantly correlated with VF MD, VF PSD, and rim area in glaucomatous eyes. Vascular changes at the optic disc as measured using OMAG may provide useful information for diagnosis and monitoring of glaucoma.

Indexed as

AngiographyCase-Control StudiesGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansLow Tension GlaucomaOptic DiskTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID27149261
PMCPMC4858256
OpenAlexW2391238303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.