Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27149090›Full record

SynthesisAIDS (London, England)2016

Effectiveness and safety of oral HIV preexposure prophylaxis for all populations.

Virginia A Fonner, Sarah L Dalglish, Caitlin E Kennedy, Rachel Baggaley, Kevin R O'Reilly, Florence M Koechlin, Michelle Rodolph, Ioannis Hodges-Mameletzis, Robert M Grant

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in AIDS (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 561 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
561citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

561 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Canadian guideline on HIV pre- and postexposure prophylaxis: 2025 update.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Guideline
  3. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

501 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Virginia A FonneraJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA bHIV Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland cMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA dHIV Department, World Health Organization, Switzerland; Gladstone Institutes and the University of California; San Francisco AIDS Foundation, San Francisco, California, USA.
Sarah L Dalglish
Caitlin E Kennedy
Rachel Baggaley
Kevin R O'Reilly
Florence M Koechlin
Michelle Rodolph
Ioannis Hodges-Mameletzis
Robert M Grant

Funding

Synthesizing HIV Behavioral Intervention Effectiveness in Developing CountriesR01MH090173 · NIMH · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI SWEAT, MICHAEL D · 2010 to 2019
$4.2M
World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePreexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) offers a promising new approach to HIV prevention. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the evidence for use of oral PrEP containing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate as an additional HIV prevention strategy in populations at substantial risk for HIV based on HIV acquisition, adverse events, drug resistance, sexual behavior, and reproductive health outcomes.

designRigorous systematic review and meta-analysis.

methodsA comprehensive search strategy reviewed three electronic databases and conference abstracts through April 2015. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis.

resultsEighteen studies were included, comprising data from 39 articles and six conference abstracts. Across populations and PrEP regimens, PrEP significantly reduced the risk of HIV acquisition compared with placebo. Trials with PrEP use more than 70% demonstrated the highest PrEP effectiveness (risk ratio = 0.30, 95% confidence interval: 0.21-0.45, P < 0.001) compared with placebo. Trials with low PrEP use did not show a significantly protective effect. Adverse events were similar between PrEP and placebo groups. More cases of drug-resistant HIV infection were found among PrEP users who initiated PrEP while acutely HIV-infected, but incidence of acquiring drug-resistant HIV during PrEP use was low. Studies consistently found no association between PrEP use and changes in sexual risk behavior. PrEP was not associated with increased pregnancy-related adverse events or hormonal contraception effectiveness.

conclusionPrEP is protective against HIV infection across populations, presents few significant safety risks, and there is no evidence of behavioral risk compensation. The effective and cost-effective use of PrEP will require development of best practices for fostering uptake and adherence among people at substantial HIV risk.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAnti-HIV AgentsChemopreventionFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMalePlacebosPre-Exposure ProphylaxisTenofovirYoung AdultAnti-HIV AgentsPlacebosTenofovir

Identifiers

PMID27149090
PMCPMC4949005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.