Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27148744›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2016

Neuronal Cell Fate Specification by the Convergence of Different Spatiotemporal Cues on a Common Terminal Selector Cascade.

Hugo Gabilondo, Johannes Stratmann, Irene Rubio-Ferrera, Irene Millán-Crespo, Patricia Contero-García, Shahrzad Bahrampour, Stefan Thor, Jonathan Benito-Sipos

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Integrated Patterning Programs DuringAnnual review of neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genetics · 2019
    Review
  16. Neuronal specification in space and time.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hugo GabilondoDepartamento de Biología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain.
Johannes StratmannDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Irene Rubio-FerreraDepartamento de Biología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain.
Irene Millán-CrespoDepartamento de Biología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain.
Patricia Contero-GarcíaDepartamento de Biología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain.
Shahrzad BahrampourDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Stefan ThorDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7602-5322
Jonathan Benito-SiposDepartamento de Biología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1159-3644
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid · ESLinköping University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Specification of the myriad of unique neuronal subtypes found in the nervous system depends upon spatiotemporal cues and terminal selector gene cascades, often acting in sequential combinatorial codes to determine final cell fate. However, a specific neuronal cell subtype can often be generated in different parts of the nervous system and at different stages, indicating that different spatiotemporal cues can converge on the same terminal selectors to thereby generate a similar cell fate. However, the regulatory mechanisms underlying such convergence are poorly understood. The Nplp1 neuropeptide neurons in the Drosophila ventral nerve cord can be subdivided into the thoracic-ventral Tv1 neurons and the dorsal-medial dAp neurons. The activation of Nplp1 in Tv1 and dAp neurons depends upon the same terminal selector cascade: col>ap/eya>dimm>Nplp1. However, Tv1 and dAp neurons are generated by different neural progenitors (neuroblasts) with different spatiotemporal appearance. Here, we find that the same terminal selector cascade is triggered by Kr/pdm>grn in dAp neurons, but by Antp/hth/exd/lbe/cas in Tv1 neurons. Hence, two different spatiotemporal combinations can funnel into a common downstream terminal selector cascade to determine a highly related cell fate.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCell DifferentiationDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGATA Transcription FactorsHomeodomain ProteinsKruppel-Like Transcription FactorsLIM-Homeodomain ProteinsNeuronsNeuropeptidesPOU Domain FactorsSignal TransductionTranscription Factorsap protein, DrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsGATA Transcription Factorsgrn protein, DrosophilaHomeodomain Proteinskn protein, DrosophilaKr protein, DrosophilaKruppel-Like Transcription FactorsLbe protein, DrosophilaLIM-Homeodomain ProteinsNeuropeptidesNplp1 protein, Drosophilanub protein, DrosophilaPOU Domain FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID27148744
PMCPMC4858240
OpenAlexW2345877077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.