Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27148459›Full record

ArticleProstate cancer2016

Predicting Low-Risk Prostate Cancer from Transperineal Saturation Biopsies.

Pim J van Leeuwen, Amila Siriwardana, Monique Roobol, Francis Ting, Daan Nieboer, James Thompson, Warick Delprado, Anne-Marie Haynes, Phillip Brenner, Phillip Stricker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prostate cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Pim J van LeeuwenSt Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre, St Vincent's Clinic, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia; Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre New South Wales, The Garvan Institute of Medical Research, The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia.
Amila SiriwardanaSt Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre, St Vincent's Clinic, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia; Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre New South Wales, The Garvan Institute of Medical Research, The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia; University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Monique RoobolDepartment of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 CE Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Francis TingSt Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre, St Vincent's Clinic, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia; Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre New South Wales, The Garvan Institute of Medical Research, The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia.
Daan NieboerDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 CE Rotterdam, Netherlands.
James ThompsonSt Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre, St Vincent's Clinic, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia.
Warick DelpradoUniversity of Notre Dame, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia.
Anne-Marie HaynesAustralian Prostate Cancer Research Centre New South Wales, The Garvan Institute of Medical Research, The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia.
Phillip BrennerSt Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre, St Vincent's Clinic, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia; Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre New South Wales, The Garvan Institute of Medical Research, The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia.
Phillip StrickerSt Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre, St Vincent's Clinic, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia; Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre New South Wales, The Garvan Institute of Medical Research, The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction. To assess the performance of five previously described clinicopathological definitions of low-risk prostate cancer (PC). Materials and Methods. Men who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) for clinical stage ≤T2, PSA <10 ng/mL, Gleason score <8 PC, diagnosed by transperineal template-guided saturation biopsy were included. The performance of five previously described criteria (i.e., criteria 1-5, criterion 1 stringent (Gleason score 6 + ≤5 mm total max core length PC + ≤3 mm max per core length PC) up to criterion 5 less stringent (Gleason score 6-7 with ≤5% Gleason grade 4) was analysed to assess ability of each to predict insignificant disease in RP specimens (defined as Gleason score ≤6 and total tumour volume <2.5 mL, or Gleason score 7 with ≤5% grade 4 and total tumour volume <0.7 mL). Results. 994 men who underwent RP were included. Criterion 4 (Gleason score 6) performed best with area under the curve of receiver operating characteristics 0.792. At decision curve analysis, criterion 4 was deemed clinically the best performing transperineal saturation biopsy-based definition for low-risk PC. Conclusions. Gleason score 6 disease demonstrated a superior trade-off between sensitivity and specificity for clarifying low-risk PC that can guide treatment and be used as reference test in diagnostic studies.

Identifiers

PMID27148459
PMCPMC4842366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.