ReviewClinical sarcoma research2016
UK guidelines for the management of bone sarcomas.
Review in Clinical sarcoma research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 119 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
119 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The clinical significance of indeterminate pulmonary nodules in patients with primary bone sarcoma: a systematic review.The British journal of radiology · 2024Pooled it
- High-Grade Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma of the Distal Tibia Presenting as a Radiographically Benign-Appearing Lesion: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Expanded methods for geometric location of 2D bone histology co-registration in 3D radiology volumes.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2026Article
- The Added Value of Plastic Surgery in the Multidisciplinary Management of Sarcoma Resection: A Multivariable Analysis of Predictors and Postoperative Outcomes.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Orthopedic preoperative evaluation and surgical strategies of hereditary multiple osteochondromas involving the spinal region.EFORT open reviews · 2026Review
- Knowledge and Clinical Practices of Primary Care Physicians Regarding Soft Tissue Sarcomas: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Clinical Presentation and Tumour Burden in Head and Neck Sarcomas: Implications for Early Diagnosis and Referral.Cancers · 2026Article
- Follow-up for patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma: validation of a rational schedule.Korean journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Risk Factors, Clinical Manifestations, and Treatment Outcomes of Primary Bone Sarcomas.Saudi medical journal · 2026Article
- Nutrition Support Interventions for Children and Young People Treated for Osteosarcoma: A Scoping Review.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025Article
- A Proof-of-Concept Solution for Co-locating 2D Histology Images in 3D for Histology-to-CT and MR Image Registration: Closing the Loop for Bone Sarcoma Treatment Planning.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- The Double Life of microRNAs in Bone Sarcomas: Oncogenic Drivers and Tumor Suppressors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- The Role of Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Primary Bone Tumours: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Use of a soft guiding template and laser device improves the success rate of computed tomography-guided bone biopsies and reduces radiation exposure.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Hereditary multiple exostoses: an educational review.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Challenges of osteosarcoma care in Africa: a scoping review of the burden, management and outcome.Ecancermedicalscience · 2025Review
- UK guidelines for the management of bone sarcomas.British journal of cancer · 2025Review
- Curatively Resected Mesenteric Lymph Node Recurrence of Ewing Sarcoma.Surgical case reports · 2025Article
59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This document is an update of the British Sarcoma Group guidelines published in 2010. The aim is to provide a reference standard for the clinical care of patients in the UK with bone sarcomas. Recent recommendations by the European Society of Medical Oncology, The National Comprehensive Cancer Network and The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence have been incorporated, and the literature since 2010 reviewed. The standards represent a consensus amongst British Sarcoma Group members in 2015. It is acknowledged that these guidelines will need further updates as care evolves. The key recommendations are that bone pain or a palpable mass should always lead to further investigation and that patients with clinico-radiological findings suggestive of a primary bone tumour at any site in the skeleton should be referred to a specialist centre and managed by a fully accredited bone sarcoma multidisciplinary team. Treatment recommendations are provided for the major tumour types and for localised, metastatic and recurrent disease. Follow up schedules are suggested.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.