Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27148235›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2016

Yeast Interactions in Inoculated Wine Fermentation.

Maurizio Ciani, Angela Capece, Francesca Comitini, Laura Canonico, Gabriella Siesto, Patrizia Romano

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
23.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 192 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Microorganisms · 2026
    Article
  5. Screening of flavor-enhancing yeast and its role in fig fermentation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Ethanol Reduction in Montepulciano Wine:Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Life ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maurizio CianiDipartimento di Scienze della Vita e dell'Ambiente, Università Politecnica delle Marche Ancona, Italy.
Angela CapeceScuola di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali, Alimentari ed Ambientali, Università degli Studi della Basilicata Potenza, Italy.
Francesca ComitiniDipartimento di Scienze della Vita e dell'Ambiente, Università Politecnica delle Marche Ancona, Italy.
Laura CanonicoDipartimento di Scienze della Vita e dell'Ambiente, Università Politecnica delle Marche Ancona, Italy.
Gabriella SiestoScuola di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali, Alimentari ed Ambientali, Università degli Studi della Basilicata Potenza, Italy.
Patrizia RomanoScuola di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali, Alimentari ed Ambientali, Università degli Studi della Basilicata Potenza, Italy.
Marche Polytechnic University · ITUniversity of Basilicata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of selected starter culture is widely diffused in winemaking. In pure fermentation, the ability of inoculated Saccharomyces cerevisiae to suppress the wild microflora is one of the most important feature determining the starter ability to dominate the process. Since the wine is the result of the interaction of several yeast species and strains, many studies are available on the effect of mixed cultures on the final wine quality. In mixed fermentation the interactions between the different yeasts composing the starter culture can led the stability of the final product and the analytical and aromatic profile. In the present review, we will discuss the recent developments regarding yeast interactions in pure and in mixed fermentation, focusing on the influence of interactions on growth and dominance in the process.

Indexed as

inoculated wine fermentationnon-SaccharomycesSaccharomyces cerevisiaestarter dominanceyeast–yeast interactions

Identifiers

PMID27148235
PMCPMC4840204
OpenAlexW2338949181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.