Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27148206›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2016

Spatio-Temporal Interdependence of Bacteria and Phytoplankton during a Baltic Sea Spring Bloom.

Carina Bunse, Mireia Bertos-Fortis, Ingrid Sassenhagen, Sirje Sildever, Conny Sjöqvist, Anna Godhe, Susanna Gross, Anke Kremp, Inga Lips, Nina Lundholm and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Carina BunseCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems - EEMiS, Linnaeus University Kalmar, Sweden.
Mireia Bertos-FortisCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems - EEMiS, Linnaeus University Kalmar, Sweden.
Ingrid SassenhagenAquatic Ecology, Lund University Lund, Sweden.
Sirje SildeverMarine Systems Institute, Tallinn University of Technology Tallinn, Estonia.
Conny SjöqvistFinnish Environmental Institute/Marine Research CentreHelsinki, Finland; Environmental and Marine Biology, Åbo Akademi UniversityÅbo, Finland.
Anna GodheDepartment of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg Gothenburg, Sweden.
Susanna GrossDepartment of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg Gothenburg, Sweden.
Anke KrempFinnish Environmental Institute/Marine Research Centre Helsinki, Finland.
Inga LipsMarine Systems Institute, Tallinn University of Technology Tallinn, Estonia.
Nina LundholmNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen Copenhagen, Denmark.
Karin RengeforsAquatic Ecology, Lund University Lund, Sweden.
Josefin SefbomDepartment of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jarone PinhassiCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems - EEMiS, Linnaeus University Kalmar, Sweden.
Catherine LegrandCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems - EEMiS, Linnaeus University Kalmar, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In temperate systems, phytoplankton spring blooms deplete inorganic nutrients and are major sources of organic matter for the microbial loop. In response to phytoplankton exudates and environmental factors, heterotrophic microbial communities are highly dynamic and change their abundance and composition both on spatial and temporal scales. Yet, most of our understanding about these processes comes from laboratory model organism studies, mesocosm experiments or single temporal transects. Spatial-temporal studies examining interactions of phytoplankton blooms and bacterioplankton community composition and function, though being highly informative, are scarce. In this study, pelagic microbial community dynamics (bacteria and phytoplankton) and environmental variables were monitored during a spring bloom across the Baltic Proper (two cruises between North Germany to Gulf of Finland). To test to what extent bacterioplankton community composition relates to the spring bloom, we used next generation amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene, phytoplankton diversity analysis based on microscopy counts and population genotyping of the dominating diatom Skeletonema marinoi. Several phytoplankton bloom related and environmental variables were identified to influence bacterial community composition. Members of Bacteroidetes and Alphaproteobacteria dominated the bacterial community composition but the bacterial groups showed no apparent correlation with direct bloom related variables. The less abundant bacterial phyla Actinobacteria, Planctomycetes, and Verrucomicrobia, on the other hand, were strongly associated with phytoplankton biomass, diatom:dinoflagellate ratio, and colored dissolved organic matter (cDOM). Many bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTUs) showed high niche specificities. For example, particular Bacteroidetes OTUs were associated with two distinct genetic clusters of S. marinoi. Our study revealed the complexity of interactions of bacterial taxa with inter- and intraspecific genetic variation in phytoplankton. Overall, our findings imply that biotic and abiotic factors during spring bloom influence bacterial community dynamics in a hierarchical manner.

Indexed as

16S rRNAbacterioplanktonBaltic Seamarine bacteriaphytoplanktonSkeletonema marinoispatio-temporalspring bloom

Identifiers

PMID27148206
PMCPMC4838809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.