Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27148184›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2016

Microencapsulation in Alginate and Chitosan Microgels to Enhance Viability of Bifidobacterium longum for Oral Delivery.

Timothy W Yeung, Elif F Üçok, Kendra A Tiani, David J McClements, David A Sela

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Preparation and In Vitro Characterization ofJournal of functional biomaterials · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Microencapsulation ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Timothy W YeungDepartment of Food Science, University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA, USA.
Elif F ÜçokDepartment of Food Science, University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA, USA.
Kendra A TianiDepartment of Food Science, University of MassachusettsAmherst, MA, USA; Commonwealth Honors College, University of MassachusettsAmherst, MA, USA.
David J McClementsDepartment of Food Science, University of MassachusettsAmherst, MA, USA; Center for Bioactive Delivery, Institute of Applied Life Science, University of MassachusettsAmherst, MA, USA.
David A SelaDepartment of Food Science, University of MassachusettsAmherst, MA, USA; Center for Bioactive Delivery, Institute of Applied Life Science, University of MassachusettsAmherst, MA, USA; Center for Microbiome Research, University of Massachusetts Medical SchoolWorcester, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probiotic microorganisms are incorporated into a wide variety of foods, supplements, and pharmaceuticals to promote human health and wellness. However, maintaining bacterial cell viability during storage and gastrointestinal transit remains a challenge. Encapsulation of bifidobacteria within food-grade hydrogel particles potentially mitigates their sensitivity to environmental stresses. In this study, Bifidobacterium longum subspecies and strains were encapsulated in core-shell microgels consisting of an alginate core and a microgel shell. Encapsulated obligate anaerobes Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis and Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum exhibited differences in viability in a strain-dependent manner, without a discernable relationship to subspecies lineage. This includes viability under aerobic storage conditions and modeled gastrointestinal tract conditions. Coating alginate microgels with chitosan did not improve viability compared to cells encapsulated in alginate microgels alone, suggesting that modifying the surface charge alone does not enhance delivery. Thus hydrogel beads have great potential for improving the stability and efficacy of bifidobacterial probiotics in various nutritional interventions.

Indexed as

bifidobacteriamicroencapsulationoral deliveryprobioticssimulated digestion

Identifiers

PMID27148184
PMCPMC4835488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.