Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27147783›Full record

Trial reportMedical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina)2016

Efficiency of Local Antiseptic Alkosol (Ethanol, Isopropanol-30g and Ortophenilphenol) and Povidone Iodide on the Incidence Of Surgical Site Infection After Inguinal Hernioplasty.

Harun Djozic, Haris Pandza, Sefik Hasukic, Samir Custovic, Berina Pandza, Amina Krupalija, Edin Beciragic

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Preventing complications in dermatologic surgery: Presurgical concerns.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Harun DjozicGeneral Hospital "Prim. dr. Abdulah Nakaš "Sarajevo", Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Haris PandzaGeneral Hospital "Prim. dr. Abdulah Nakaš "Sarajevo", Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Sefik HasukicSurgery clinic, University Clinical Center, Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Samir CustovicGeneral Hospital "Prim. dr. Abdulah Nakaš "Sarajevo", Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Berina PandzaFaculty of medicine, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Amina KrupalijaGeneral Hospital "Prim. dr. Abdulah Nakaš "Sarajevo", Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Edin BeciragicGeneral Hospital "Prim. dr. Abdulah Nakaš "Sarajevo", Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
University Clinical Center Tuzla · BAUniversity of Sarajevo · BA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe risk of wound infection after elective inguinal hernia repair depends on several factors. One of the most important factors is the preoperative skin preparation. The use of antisepsis is performed to reduce the risk of surgical site infections (SSIs) and to remove causing organisms. This work compares two different agent forms for preoperative skin preparation to prevent SSIs.

objectivesThe objective of the study is comparing the effects of two different agents used for preoperative skin preparation and prevention of SSIs. MATERIAL AND

methods100 adult patients were divided and randomized into two groups, each containing 50 patients. Both groups included patients that are scheduled for elective Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. The first group includes patients whose skin preparations were done with povidone iodine (PI) only. The second group included patients that are treated with two antiseptics; Alkosol (96% ethanol, isopropanol-30g and ortophenilphenol-0.1g) and povidone iodide. Alkosol is applied before the induction of anesthesia. The povidone iodide is applied after Alkosol has evaporated. The presence of bacterial growth in the wound was determined 24 and 48 hours after operation. Swabs were used to take samples, which were then cultivated to check for bacterial growth. The presence of infection was also determined by the following criteria: pain or tenderness, induration, erythema, local warmth of the wound etc.

resultsThe surgeon or clinician declared that after 24 hours the wound was infected in 20 patients in the control group and in 22 patients after 48 hours. In the Alkosol (96% ethanol, isopropanol-30g and ortophenilphenol-0.1g) and povidone iodide group infection was declared in only 3 patients after 24 hours. DISCUSSION: Compared to the use of providone only, the use of Alkosol (96% ethanol, isopropanol-30g and ortophenilphenol-0.1g) and povidone iodide has many advantages and was associated with lower rates of SSIs following clean surgery. A larger trial is warranted in order to add definitive and more conclusive data to the current evidence base.

Indexed as

Herniorrhaphy2-PropanolAdolescentAdultAgedAnti-Infective Agents, LocalEthanolFemaleHernia, InguinalHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPovidone-IodinePreoperative CareProspective Studies2-PropanolAnti-Infective Agents, LocalEthanolPovidone-Iodineethanolhernia repairpovidone iodidesurgical site infection

Identifiers

PMID27147783
PMCPMC4851501
OpenAlexW2316049171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.