Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27147767›Full record

ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2016

Improving reporting of infant deaths, maternal deaths and stillbirths in Haryana, India.

Preeti H Negandhi, Sutapa B Neogi, Sapna Chopra, Amit Phogat, Rupinder Sahota, Ravikant Gupta, Rakesh Gupta, Sanjay Zodpey

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Preeti H NegandhiIndian Institute of Public Health Delhi, Public Health Foundation of India, Plot 47, Sector 44, Institutional Area, Gurgaon - 122002, Haryana, India .
Sutapa B NeogiIndian Institute of Public Health Delhi, Public Health Foundation of India, Plot 47, Sector 44, Institutional Area, Gurgaon - 122002, Haryana, India .
Sapna ChopraIndian Institute of Public Health Delhi, Public Health Foundation of India, Plot 47, Sector 44, Institutional Area, Gurgaon - 122002, Haryana, India .
Amit PhogatNational Health Mission, State Government of Haryana, Panchkula, India .
Rupinder SahotaNational Health Mission, State Government of Haryana, Panchkula, India .
Ravikant GuptaNational Health Mission, State Government of Haryana, Panchkula, India .
Rakesh GuptaState Government of Haryana, Chandigarh, India .
Sanjay ZodpeyIndian Institute of Public Health Delhi, Public Health Foundation of India, Plot 47, Sector 44, Institutional Area, Gurgaon - 122002, Haryana, India .
Government of Haryana · INPublic Health Foundation of India · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Underreporting hampers the accurate estimation of the numbers of infant and maternal deaths and stillbirths in India. In Haryana state, a surveillance-based model - the Maternal Infant Death Review System - was launched in 2013 to try to resolve this issue. The system is a mixture of routine passive data collection and active surveillance by specially recruited and trained field volunteers. The volunteers gather the relevant data from child day-care centres, community health centres, cremation grounds, hospitals, the municipal corporation's offices and primary health centres and regularly visit health subcentres. The collected data are triangulated against the standard death registers and discussions with relevant community members. The details of any unregistered death are rapidly uploaded on the system's web-based platform. In April 2014, we made field observations, reviewed records and conducted in-depth interviews with the key stakeholders to see if the system's performance matched the state government's planned objectives. The data collected indicate that implementation of the system has led to quantitative and qualitative improvements in reporting of infant and maternal deaths and stillbirths. Completeness and consistency in the reporting of deaths are essential for focused policy and programmatic interventions and there remains scope for improvement in Haryana via further reform and changes in policy. The model in its current form is potentially sustainable and scalable in similar settings elsewhere.

Indexed as

Infant DeathMaternal DeathStillbirthDatabases, FactualData CollectionHumansIndiaInfantInterviews as TopicQualitative ResearchQuality Improvement

Identifiers

PMID27147767
PMCPMC4850528
OpenAlexW2343115586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.