Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27147659›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016

Effects of Electrical Stimulation in the Inferior Colliculus on Frequency Discrimination by Rhesus Monkeys and Implications for the Auditory Midbrain Implant.

Daniel S Pages, Deborah A Ross, Vanessa M Puñal, Shruti Agashe, Isaac Dweck, Jerel Mueller, Warren M Grill, Blake S Wilson, Jennifer M Groh

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Animal Models of Tinnitus Treatment: Cochlear and Brain Stimulation.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Daniel S PagesDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, dspages@gmail.com jmgroh@duke.edu.
Deborah A RossCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience.
Vanessa M PuñalDepartment of Neurobiology.ORCID 0000-0002-2969-3993
Shruti AgasheDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, and.
Isaac DweckCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience.ORCID 0000-0001-8517-4103
Jerel MuellerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, and School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061.
Warren M GrillDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, and.
Blake S WilsonSchools of Medicine and Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, and.
Jennifer M GrohDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Neurobiology, dspages@gmail.com jmgroh@duke.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6435-3935
Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod · FRDuke University · USInstitute of Neurobiology · BGVirginia Tech · US

Funding

Visual signals in auditory midbrainR01EY016478 · NEI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GROH, JENNIFER M · 2006 to 2010
$1.8M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY016478
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledUnderstanding the relationship between the auditory selectivity of neurons and their contribution to perception is critical to the design of effective auditory brain prosthetics. These prosthetics seek to mimic natural activity patterns to achieve desired perceptual outcomes. We measured the contribution of inferior colliculus (IC) sites to perception using combined recording and electrical stimulation. Monkeys performed a frequency-based discrimination task, reporting whether a probe sound was higher or lower in frequency than a reference sound. Stimulation pulses were paired with the probe sound on 50% of trials (0.5-80 μA, 100-300 Hz, n = 172 IC locations in 3 rhesus monkeys). Electrical stimulation tended to bias the animals' judgments in a fashion that was coarsely but significantly correlated with the best frequency of the stimulation site compared with the reference frequency used in the task. Although there was considerable variability in the effects of stimulation (including impairments in performance and shifts in performance away from the direction predicted based on the site's response properties), the results indicate that stimulation of the IC can evoke percepts correlated with the frequency-tuning properties of the IC. Consistent with the implications of recent human studies, the main avenue for improvement for the auditory midbrain implant suggested by our findings is to increase the number and spatial extent of electrodes, to increase the size of the region that can be electrically activated, and to provide a greater range of evoked percepts. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Patients with hearing loss stemming from causes that interrupt the auditory pathway after the cochlea need a brain prosthetic to restore hearing. Recently, prosthetic stimulation in the human inferior colliculus (IC) was evaluated in a clinical trial. Thus far, speech understanding was limited for the subjects and this limitation is thought to be partly due to challenges in harnessing the sound frequency representation in the IC. Here, we tested the effects of IC stimulation in monkeys trained to report the sound frequencies they heard. Our results indicate that the IC can be used to introduce a range of frequency percepts and suggest that placement of a greater number of electrode contacts may improve the effectiveness of such implants.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsAcoustic StimulationAlgorithmsAnimalsAuditory PathwaysBehavior, AnimalDiscrimination, PsychologicalElectric StimulationElectrodes, ImplantedFemaleInferior ColliculiMacaca mulattaMesencephalonauditoryauditory midbrain implantelectrical stimulationinferior colliculusprosthesis

Identifiers

PMID27147659
PMCPMC4854969
OpenAlexW2345844493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.