Reply to Deecke and Soekadar: Do conventional readiness potentials reflect true volitionality?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

1. The Relationship Between Respiratory-Related Premotor Potentials and Small Perturbations in Ventilation.Frontiers in physiology · 2018
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential). The unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act.1983
• Comment on
  The point of no return in vetoing self-initiated movements.2016
• Comment on
  Beyond the point of no return: Last-minute changes in human motor performance.2016

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as