Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27147543›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of anaesthesia2016

Value of knowing physical characteristics of the airway device before using it.

A A J Van Zundert, M W Skinner, T C R V Van Zundert, S R Luney, J J Pandit

Registry-linked trialAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of anaesthesia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03272776 (A Multicenter Study of the Protector Laryngeal Mask in Non Paralyzed, Anesthetized Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03272776 completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

A Multicenter Study of the Protector Laryngeal Mask in Non Paralyzed, Anesthetized Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorMatilde ZaballosRan2017 to 2018Enrolled280ConditionsAirwayArmsProtector Laryngeal Mask airway
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Extraglottic airway devices: technology update.Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A A J Van ZundertDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, and the School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Butterfield Street, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia vanzundertandre@gmail.com.
M W SkinnerDepartment of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
T C R V Van ZundertDepartment of Anaesthesia, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
S R LuneyDeparment of Anaesthesia, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
J J PanditNuffield Department of Anaesthetics, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Equipment DesignHumansIntubation, Intratracheal

Identifiers

PMID27147543
PMCPMC4913394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.