Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27147450›Full record

Trial reportSchizophrenia bulletin2016

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Clinician-Supported Problem-Solving Bibliotherapy for Family Caregivers of People With First-Episode Psychosis.

Wai Tong Chien, David R Thompson, Dan I Lubman, Terence V McCann

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Bibliotherapy: Reading OVID During COVID.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020
    Article
  12. Taking care of the carers: support for families of persons with early psychosis.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2017
    Article
  13. Improving outcomes of first-episode psychosis: an overview.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2017
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Wai Tong ChienSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong; wai.tong.chien@polyu.edu.hk.
David R ThompsonCentre for the Heart and Mind, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Dan I LubmanTurning Point, Eastern Health and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Terence V McCannCentre for Chronic Disease, College of Health and Biomedicine, Discipline of Nursing, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.
Hong Kong Polytechnic University · HKMind Australia · AUMonash University · AUVictoria University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Family interventions for first-episode psychosis (FEP) are an integral component of treatment, with positive effects mainly on patients' mental state and relapse rate. However, comparatively little attention has been paid to the effects of family interventions on caregivers' stress coping and well-being, especially in non-Western countries. We aimed to test the effects of a 5-month clinician-supported problem-solving bibliotherapy (CSPSB) for Chinese family caregivers of people with FEP in improving family burden and carers' problem-solving and caregiving experience, and in reducing psychotic symptoms and duration of re-hospitalizations, compared with those only received usual outpatient family support (UOFS). A randomized controlled trial was conducted across 2 early psychosis clinics in Hong Kong, where there might be inadequate usual family support services for FEP patients. A total of 116 caregivers were randomly selected, and after baseline measurement, randomly assigned to the CSPSB or UOFS. They were also assessed at 1-week and 6- and 12-month post-intervention. Intention-to-treat analyses were applied and indicated that the CSPSB group reported significantly greater improvements in family burden and caregiving experience, and reductions in severity of psychotic symptoms and duration of re-hospitalizations, than the UOFS group at 6- and 12-month follow-up. CSPSB produces moderate long-term benefits to caregivers and FEP patients, and is a low-cost adjunct to UOFS.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareProblem SolvingAdolescentAdultBibliotherapyCaregiversCost of IllnessFamilyFamily TherapyFemaleHong KongHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychotic DisordersYoung Adultburdenexperience of caregivingfamily interventionpatientsrelapse

Identifiers

PMID27147450
PMCPMC5049531
OpenAlexW2345636412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.