Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27147384›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2016

Orthotics and taping in the management of vertebral fractures in people with osteoporosis: a systematic review.

Victoria A Goodwin, Abigail J Hall, Emily Rogers, Alison Bethel

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Machine-learning-based approach for nonunion prediction following osteoporotic vertebral fractures.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. [Pain management in osteoporosis].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Time course of osteoporotic vertebral fractures by magnetic resonance imaging using a simple classification: a multicenter prospective cohort study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2017
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Victoria A GoodwinNIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Abigail J HallNIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Emily RogersRoyal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.
Alison BethelNIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
University of Exeter · GBRoyal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health RDA/02/06/41
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo establish the current evidence base for the use of orthotics and taping for people with osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF).

designSystematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Medline-In Process, EMBASE, AMED, CINAHL, PEDro, TRIP, EThOS, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses and Cochrane (CDSR, DARE, CMR, HTA, EED) plus Cochrane Central, UK Clinical Research Network portfolio, Controlled Clinical Trials register and the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials register. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: All study designs were considered if they reported in English and evaluated the impact of using an external support, such as a spinal brace, orthosis or postural tape, with adults with OVF. All outcomes were considered.

resultsNine studies were included comprising two parallel-group randomised controlled trials, four randomised cross-over trials, two before-after (single arm) studies and a parallel group observational study. No qualitative studies were identified. A wide range of outcomes assessing impairments, activities and participation were assessed but the findings were mixed. The quality of studies was limited.

conclusionsThe current evidence for using orthotic devices or taping for people with OVF is inconsistent and of limited quality and therefore careful consideration should be taken by clinicians before prescribing them in practice. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015020893.

Indexed as

BracesEvaluation Studies as TopicEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHumansMaleOsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesPainRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSpinal Fracturesorthoticsosteoporosissystematic reviewvertebral fracture

Identifiers

PMID27147384
PMCPMC4861088
OpenAlexW2340378628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.