ArticleMedical physics2016
Improved frame-based estimation of head motion in PET brain imaging.
Article in Medical physics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Different preprocessing strategies lead to different conclusions: A [Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2020Trial
- Quantitative validation of data-driven motion correction for brain PET using phantom with motion generator system.EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- Motion study on upright patient positioning in walk-through PET: evaluation in a clinical setting.EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- Reproducible brain PET data analysis: easier said than done.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2024Article
- Markerless head motion tracking and event-by-event correction in brain PET.Physics in medicine and biology · 2023Article
- Evaluation of Data-Driven Rigid Motion Correction in Clinical Brain PET Imaging.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022Article
- Assessment of motion and model bias on the detection of dopamine response to behavioral challenge.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2022Article
- Evaluating different methods of MR-based motion correction in simultaneous PET/MR using a head phantom moved by a robotic system.EJNMMI physics · 2022Article
- Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks Aided Motion Correction of DynamicJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2021Article
- Optimizing the frame duration for data-driven rigid motion estimation in brain PET imaging.Medical physics · 2021Article
- Physiological skin FDG uptake: A quantitative and regional distribution assessment using PET/MRI.PloS one · 2021Article
- Body motion detection and correction in cardiac PET: Phantom and human studies.Medical physics · 2019Article
- Article
- From simultaneous to synergistic MR-PET brain imaging: A review of hybrid MR-PET imaging methodologies.Human brain mapping · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeHead motion during PET brain imaging can cause significant degradation of image quality. Several authors have proposed ways to compensate for PET brain motion to restore image quality and improve quantitation. Head restraints can reduce movement but are unreliable; thus the need for alternative strategies such as data-driven motion estimation or external motion tracking. Herein, the authors present a data-driven motion estimation method using a preprocessing technique that allows the usage of very short duration frames, thus reducing the intraframe motion problem commonly observed in the multiple frame acquisition method.
methodsThe list mode data for PET acquisition is uniformly divided into 5-s frames and images are reconstructed without attenuation correction. Interframe motion is estimated using a 3D multiresolution registration algorithm and subsequently compensated for. For this study, the authors used 8 PET brain studies that used F-18 FDG as the tracer and contained minor or no initial motion. After reconstruction and prior to motion estimation, known motion was introduced to each frame to simulate head motion during a PET acquisition. To investigate the trade-off in motion estimation and compensation with respect to frames of different length, the authors summed 5-s frames accordingly to produce 10 and 60 s frames. Summed images generated from the motion-compensated reconstructed frames were then compared to the original PET image reconstruction without motion compensation.
resultsThe authors found that our method is able to compensate for both gradual and step-like motions using frame times as short as 5 s with a spatial accuracy of 0.2 mm on average. Complex volunteer motion involving all six degrees of freedom was estimated with lower accuracy (0.3 mm on average) than the other types investigated. Preprocessing of 5-s images was necessary for successful image registration. Since their method utilizes nonattenuation corrected frames, it is not susceptible to motion introduced between CT and PET acquisitions.
conclusionsThe authors have shown that they can estimate motion for frames with time intervals as short as 5 s using nonattenuation corrected reconstructed FDG PET brain images. Intraframe motion in 60-s frames causes degradation of accuracy to about 2 mm based on the motion type.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.