Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27147355›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2016

Improved frame-based estimation of head motion in PET brain imaging.

J M Mukherjee, C Lindsay, A Mukherjee, P Olivier, L Shao, M A King, R Licho

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Different preprocessing strategies lead to different conclusions: A [Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2020
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evaluation of Data-Driven Rigid Motion Correction in Clinical Brain PET Imaging.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Article
  7. Assessment of motion and model bias on the detection of dopamine response to behavioral challenge.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks Aided Motion Correction of DynamicJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

J M MukherjeeDepartment of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01655.
C LindsayDepartment of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01655.
A MukherjeeAware, Inc., Bedford, Massachusetts 01730.
P OlivierPhilips Medical Systems, Cleveland, Ohio 44143.
L ShaoViewRay, Oakwood Village, Ohio 44146.
M A KingDepartment of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01655.
R LichoDepartment of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01655.
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USAware (United States) · USPhilips (United States) · USViewRay (United States) · US

Funding

PATIENT MOTION DETECTION AND COMPENSATION IN SPECTR01EB001457 · NIBIB · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI KING, MICHAEL A · 2003 to 2013
$5.7M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB001457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHead motion during PET brain imaging can cause significant degradation of image quality. Several authors have proposed ways to compensate for PET brain motion to restore image quality and improve quantitation. Head restraints can reduce movement but are unreliable; thus the need for alternative strategies such as data-driven motion estimation or external motion tracking. Herein, the authors present a data-driven motion estimation method using a preprocessing technique that allows the usage of very short duration frames, thus reducing the intraframe motion problem commonly observed in the multiple frame acquisition method.

methodsThe list mode data for PET acquisition is uniformly divided into 5-s frames and images are reconstructed without attenuation correction. Interframe motion is estimated using a 3D multiresolution registration algorithm and subsequently compensated for. For this study, the authors used 8 PET brain studies that used F-18 FDG as the tracer and contained minor or no initial motion. After reconstruction and prior to motion estimation, known motion was introduced to each frame to simulate head motion during a PET acquisition. To investigate the trade-off in motion estimation and compensation with respect to frames of different length, the authors summed 5-s frames accordingly to produce 10 and 60 s frames. Summed images generated from the motion-compensated reconstructed frames were then compared to the original PET image reconstruction without motion compensation.

resultsThe authors found that our method is able to compensate for both gradual and step-like motions using frame times as short as 5 s with a spatial accuracy of 0.2 mm on average. Complex volunteer motion involving all six degrees of freedom was estimated with lower accuracy (0.3 mm on average) than the other types investigated. Preprocessing of 5-s images was necessary for successful image registration. Since their method utilizes nonattenuation corrected frames, it is not susceptible to motion introduced between CT and PET acquisitions.

conclusionsThe authors have shown that they can estimate motion for frames with time intervals as short as 5 s using nonattenuation corrected reconstructed FDG PET brain images. Intraframe motion in 60-s frames causes degradation of accuracy to about 2 mm based on the motion type.

Indexed as

ArtifactsHeadMotionAlgorithmsBrainComputer SimulationFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedModels, AnatomicPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID27147355
PMCPMC4841802
OpenAlexW2338876365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.