Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27147087›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of genomics and human genetics2016

Phenome-Wide Association Studies as a Tool to Advance Precision Medicine.

Joshua C Denny, Lisa Bastarache, Dan M Roden

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of genomics and human genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 149 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
149citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

149 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evaluating pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in mothers with genetic disease using electronic health care records.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

89 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joshua C DennyDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee 37203; email: josh.denny@vanderbilt.edu.
Lisa BastaracheDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee 37203; email: josh.denny@vanderbilt.edu.
Dan M RodenDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee 37203; email: josh.denny@vanderbilt.edu.

Funding

Pharmacogenomics of Arrhythmia TherapyU19HL065962 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI RODEN, DAN M · 2010 to 2014
$17.4M
Understanding and preventing HLA-associated drug reactionsP50GM115305 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI PHILLIPS, ELIZABETH · 2015 to 2019
$13.0M
Vanderbilt Genome-Electronic Records ProjectU01HG004603 · NHGRI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI RODEN, DAN M · 2007 to 2011
$7.3M
From GWAS to PheWAS: Scanning the EMR Phenome for Gene-disease AssociationsR01LM010685 · NLM · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BASTARACHE, LISA · 2011 to 2022
$6.3M
National Infrastructure for Standardized and Portable EHR Phenotyping AlgorithmsR01GM105688 · NIGMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI LUO, YUAN, PATHAK, JYOTISHMAN · 2013 to 2020
$5.7M
VGER, the Vanderbilt Genome-Electronic Records ProjectU01HG008672 · NHGRI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DENNY, JOSHUA C., RODEN, DAN M · 2015 to 2019
$5.1M
Vanderbilt Genome Electronic Records ProjectU01HG006378 · NHGRI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI RODEN, DAN M · 2011 to 2014
$4.0M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004603NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG006378NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG008672NHLBI NIH HHS U19 HL065962NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM115305NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM105688NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010685
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beginning in the early 2000s, the accumulation of biospecimens linked to electronic health records (EHRs) made possible genome-phenome studies (i.e., comparative analyses of genetic variants and phenotypes) using only data collected as a by-product of typical health care. In addition to disease and trait genetics, EHRs proved a valuable resource for analyzing pharmacogenetic traits and developing reverse genetics approaches such as phenome-wide association studies (PheWASs). PheWASs are designed to survey which of many phenotypes may be associated with a given genetic variant. PheWAS methods have been validated through replication of hundreds of known genotype-phenotype associations, and their use has differentiated between true pleiotropy and clinical comorbidity, added context to genetic discoveries, and helped define disease subtypes, and may also help repurpose medications. PheWAS methods have also proven to be useful with research-collected data. Future efforts that integrate broad, robust collection of phenotype data (e.g., EHR data) with purpose-collected research data in combination with a greater understanding of EHR data will create a rich resource for increasingly more efficient and detailed genome-phenome analysis to usher in new discoveries in precision medicine.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome, HumanGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrecision Medicineelectronic health recordgenome-wide association studyphenome-wide association studyphenotyping

Identifiers

PMID27147087
PMCPMC5480096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.