Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27146877›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2016

Invasive candidiasis: from mycobiome to infection, therapy, and prevention.

L Lagunes, J Rello

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prognostic impact ofAnnals of intensive care · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. The Prevalence and Drug Susceptibility ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Insights intoJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. Biofilm Formation in Medically ImportantJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Augmented Enterocyte Damage DuringFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Staged development of long-lived T-cell receptor αβ TThe Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L LagunesCritical Care Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Ps Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain. leonel.lagunes@gmail.com.
J RelloDepartment of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Instituto de Salud Carlos III · ESVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Candida spp. are commonly found in humans, colonizing most healthy individuals. A high prevalence of invasive candidiasis has been reported in recent years. Here, we assess the relation between Candida spp. as part of the human mycobiome, the host defense mechanisms, and the pathophysiology of invasive disease in critically ill patients. Many hypotheses have been proposed to explain the different immune responses to the process where Candida goes through healthy mycobiome to colonization to invasion; the involvement of other microbiota inhabitants, changes in temperature, low nitrogen levels, and the caspase system activation have been described. Patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) are at the highest risk for invasive candidiasis, mostly due to the severity of their disease, immune-suppressive states, prolonged length of stay, broad-spectrum antibiotics, septic shock, and Candida colonization. The first approach should be using predictive scores as screening, followed by the determination of biomarkers (when available), and, in the near future, probably immune-genomics and analysis of the clinical background in order to initiate prompt and correct treatment. Regarding treatment, the initiation with an echinocandin is strongly recommended in critically ill patients. In conclusion, prompt treatment and adequate source control in the more severe patients remains the ultimate goal, as well as restoration of a healthy microbiota.

Indexed as

Candidiasis, InvasiveMycobiomeHumansRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID27146877
OpenAlexW2346529267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.