Trial reportAIDS and behavior2016
Sharing of Investigational Drug Among Participants in the Voice Trial.
Trial report in AIDS and behavior, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT00705679 (Phase 2B Safety and Effectiveness Study of Tenofovir 1% Gel, Tenofovir Disproxil Fumarate Tablet and Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Tablet for the Prevention of HIV Infection in Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase 2B Safety and Effectiveness Study of Tenofovir 1% Gel, Tenofovir Disproxil Fumarate Tablet and Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Tablet for the Prevention of HIV Infection in Women
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Population prevalence of antiretroviral therapy sharing and its association with HIV viremia in rural Uganda: a cross-sectional population-based study.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Product sharing among participants can impact on adherence and compromise the outcome in clinical trials. We describe incidents of product sharing at the Durban clinical research sites conducting the VOICE trial. The Durban sites enrolled 2750 women with 1103 and 1647 participants randomized to the vaginal gel and oral tablet arms respectively. Monthly pill and applicator counts including product assessments were conducted by pharmacists. Discrepancies with product counts prompted discussions with participants. Thirty-two cases of product sharing were identified. Vaginal gels were more commonly shared than oral tablets. Product sharing between study participants and their female friends or relatives living in the same household was identified as the most common source of product sharing in this analysis. Study product counts and pharmacist-driven discussions with participants may help to identify reasons for product sharing and inform the development of strategies for PrEP implementation outside of the research setting. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00705679.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.