Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27146639›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2016

Tobacco Pricing in Military Stores: Views of Military Policy Leaders.

Elizabeth A Smith, Sara A Jahnke, Walker S C Poston, Ruth E Malone, Christopher K Haddock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Stroke, Smoking and Vaping: The No-Good, the Bad and the Ugly.Annals of public health and research · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elizabeth A SmithDepartment of Social & Behavioral Science, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; libby.smith@ucsf.edu.
Sara A JahnkeNational Development and Research Institutes, New York, NY.
Walker S C PostonNational Development and Research Institutes, New York, NY.
Ruth E MaloneDepartment of Social & Behavioral Science, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA;
Christopher K HaddockNational Development and Research Institutes, New York, NY.

Funding

Barriers to Effective Tobacco Control Policy Implementation in the US MilitaryR01DA036507 · NIDA · NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH INSTITUTES, INC. · PI HADDOCK, CHRISTOPHER KEITH, MALONE, RUTH E · 2013 to 2015
$1.8M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHigher tobacco taxes reduce tobacco use. On military installations, cigarettes and other tobacco products are sold tax-free, keeping prices artificially low. Pricing regulations in the military specify that tobacco should be within 5% of the local most competitive price, but prices still average almost 13% lower than those at local Walmarts.

methodsTo gain insight into policy leaders' ideas and positions on military tobacco pricing, we interviewed members of the Department of Defense (DoD) Addictive Substances Misuse Advisory Committee and the Advisory Committee on Tobacco about tobacco pricing policies (n = 12).

resultsParticipants frequently lacked specific knowledge of details of military pricing policy, and the impact higher prices might have on military tobacco use. Most participants thought tobacco should not be sold at military stores, but many also felt that this policy change was unlikely due to tobacco industry pressure, and DoD reliance on tobacco profits to support Morale, Welfare, and Recreation funds.

conclusionsAchieving a tobacco-free military will require changing pricing policy, but this study suggests that for effective implementation, military leadership must also understand and articulate more clearly the rationale for doing so. IMPLICATIONS: Previous work has found that adherence to military tobacco pricing policy is inconsistent at best. This study suggests that lack of knowledge about the policy and conflicting pressures resulting from the funding stream tobacco sales represent extend to high level military policy leaders. Without clearer information and direction, these leaders are unlikely to be able to establish and implement better tobacco pricing policy.

Indexed as

Health PolicyMilitary PersonnelSmoking PreventionCommerceHumansInterviews as TopicSmoking CessationTaxesTobacco ProductsUnited StatesUnited States Department of Defense

Identifiers

PMID27146639
PMCPMC5016848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.