Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27146602›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Is lymphovascular invasion a powerful predictor for biochemical recurrence in pT3 N0 prostate cancer? Results from the K-CaP database.

Yong Hyun Park, Yejin Kim, Hwanjo Yu, In Young Choi, Seok-Soo Byun, Cheol Kwak, Byung Ha Chung, Hyun Moo Lee, Choung Soo Kim, Ji Youl Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Korea Cancer Big Data Platform (K-CBP) for Cancer Research.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yong Hyun ParkDepartment of Urology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yejin KimDepartment of Creative IT Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, Korea.
Hwanjo YuDepartment of Creative IT Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, Korea.
In Young ChoiDepartment of Medical Informatics, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seok-Soo ByunDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Cheol KwakDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Byung Ha ChungDepartment of Urology, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea.
Hyun Moo LeeDepartment of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Choung Soo KimDepartment of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ji Youl LeeDepartment of Urology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess the impact of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) on the risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR) in pT3 N0 prostate cancer, clinical data were extracted from 1,622 patients with pT3 N0 prostate cancer from the K-CaP database. Patients with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (n = 325) or insufficient pathologic or follow-up data (n = 87) were excluded. The primary endpoint was the oncologic importance of LVI, and the secondary endpoint was the hierarchical relationships for estimating BCR between the evaluated variables. LVI was noted in 260 patients (21.5%) and was significantly associated with other adverse clinicopathologic features. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, LVI was significantly associated with an increased risk of BCR after adjusting for known prognostic factors. In the Bayesian belief network analysis, LVI and pathologic Gleason score were found to be first-degree associates of BCR, whereas prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, seminal vesicle invasion, perineural invasion, and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia were considered second-degree associates. In the random survival forest, pathologic Gleason score, LVI, and PSA level were three most important variables in determining BCR of patients with pT3 N0 prostate cancer. In conclusion, LVI is one of the most powerful adverse prognostic factors for BCR in patients with pT3 N0 prostate cancer.

Indexed as

AgedBayes TheoremHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsSurvival AnalysisVascular NeoplasmsProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID27146602
PMCPMC4857072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.