Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27146591›Full record

ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2016

Radiotherapy and Hormone Treatment in Prostate Cancer.

Dirk Böhmer, Manfred Wirth, Kurt Miller, Volker Budach, Axel Heidenreich, Thomas Wiegel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Peritoneal Flap in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2020
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Natural Guardians: Natural Compounds as Radioprotectors in Cancer Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2016
    Article
  9. Avoid Downplaying Side Effects.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dirk BöhmerDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Urology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Department of Urology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Department of Urology, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm.
Manfred Wirth
Kurt Miller
Volker Budach
Axel Heidenreich
Thomas Wiegel
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate cancer has the highest incidence of any type of cancer in Germany; an estimated 67 000 new diagnoses of prostate cancer will be made in 2016. In the current German S3 guideline for the treatment of prostate cancer, radiotherapy-sometimes in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-is one of the two recommended options for treatment with curative intent (the other is radical prostatectomy). There have been many publications on this subject, yet it is still often unclear in routine practice how ADT should be administered, and for how long.

methodsThis review is based on publications retrieved by a selective literature search, with special attention to controlled trials.

resultsFor low risk patients, radiotherapy without ADT is indicated (evidence level 1). Patients with localized prostate cancer and an intermediate risk benefit from radiotherapy combined with a four-to-six-month course of ADT. In this situation, a higher radiation dose might be an effective substitute for ADT (evidence level 1-2). For patients at high risk, radiotherapy combined with long-term hormonal treatment is the standard therapy, as it significantly improves all oncological end points (evidence level 1). For example, in the largest randomized and controlled trial, this form of treatment reduced cancer-specific mortality from 19% to 9% . Higher radiation doses of 66-74 Gy and longer ADT can improve local control at the cost of increased urethral toxicity.

conclusionAndrogen deprivation combined with external beam radiotherapy is a curative standard option for patients with prostate cancer who are at high risk of recurrence. The modern radiotherapeutic techniques that are now available, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy, enable a further improvement of the risk/benefit ratio.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionAndrogen AntagonistsChemoradiotherapyDisease-Free SurvivalEvidence-Based MedicineGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy DosageSurvival RateAndrogen Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID27146591
PMCPMC4985515
OpenAlexW2346619617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.