Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27146401›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2016

Premature responding is associated with approach to a food cue in male and female heterogeneous stock rats.

Christopher P King, Abraham A Palmer, Leah C Solberg Woods, Larry W Hawk, Jerry B Richards, Paul J Meyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Genomic Loci Influencing Cue-Reactivity in Heterogeneous Stock Rats.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christopher P KingDepartment of Psychology, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA. cpking@buffalo.edu.
Abraham A PalmerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Leah C Solberg WoodsDepartment of Pediatrics, Human and Molecular Genetics, Center Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Larry W HawkDepartment of Psychology, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Jerry B RichardsResearch Institute on Addictions, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Paul J MeyerDepartment of Psychology, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.

Funding

Sequencing CoreP50DA037844 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI PALMER, ABRAHAM A · 2014 to 2023
$27.4M
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA037844
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleDisorders of behavioral regulation, including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and drug addiction, are in part due to poor inhibitory control, attentional deficits, and hyper-responsivity to reward-associated cues.

objectivesTo determine whether these traits are related, we tested genetically variable male and female heterogeneous stock rats in the choice reaction time (CRT) task and Pavlovian conditioned approach (PavCA). Sex differences in the response to methylphenidate during the CRT were also assessed.

methodsIn the CRT task, rats were required to withhold responding until one of two lights indicated whether responses into a left or right port would be reinforced with water. Reaction time on correct trials and premature responses were the operational definitions of attention and response inhibition, respectively. Rats were also pretreated with oral methylphenidate (0, 2, 4 mg/kg) during the CRT task to determine whether this drug would improve performance. Subsequently, during PavCA, presentation of an illuminated lever predicted the delivery of a food pellet into a food-cup. Lever-directed approach (sign-tracking) and food-cup approach (goal-tracking) were the primary measures, and rats were categorized as "sign-trackers" and "goal-trackers" using an index based on these measures.

resultsSign-trackers made more premature responses than goal-trackers but showed no differences in reaction time. There were sex differences in both tasks, with females having higher sign-tracking, completing more CRT trials, and making more premature responses after methylphenidate administration.

conclusionsThese results indicate that response inhibition is related to reward-cue responsivity, suggesting that these traits are influenced by common genetic factors.

Indexed as

AnimalsChoice BehaviorConditioning, ClassicalCuesFeeding BehaviorFemaleFoodInhibition, PsychologicalMaleModels, AnimalMotivationRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReaction TimeRewardAction impulsivityAssociative learningAutoshapingClassical conditioningConditioned responseFeeding behaviorIncentive salienceMotivationReward stimuliStimulant drugs

Identifiers

PMID27146401
PMCPMC5025873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.