Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27146161›Full record

ArticleCBE life sciences education2016

Development and Assessment of Modules to Integrate Quantitative Skills in Introductory Biology Courses.

Kathleen Hoffman, Sarah Leupen, Kathy Dowell, Kerrie Kephart, Jeff Leips

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CBE life sciences education, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Teaching Basic Calculations in an Introductory Biology Lab.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Data-rich textbook figures promote core competencies: Comparison of two textbooks.Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · 2021
    Article
  7. Data science in cell imaging.Journal of cell science · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kathleen HoffmanDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Maryland-Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21250.
Sarah LeupenDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland-Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21250.
Kathy DowellevalSolutions, Mount Airy, MD 21771.
Kerrie KephartFaculty Development Center, University of Maryland-Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21250.
Jeff LeipsDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland-Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21250 leips@umbc.edu.

Funding

The MARC U*STAR Program at UMBCT34GM008663 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY · PI ROBINSON, PHYLLIS R · 1997 to 2019
$21.9M
The Interdisciplinary Quantitative Bioscience (IQB) Program at UMBCT36GM078008 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY · PI LINDAHL, LASSE A · 2008 to 2012
$1.5M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS 1T36GM078008NIGMS NIH HHS T34 GM008663NIGMS NIH HHS T36 GM078008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Redesigning undergraduate biology courses to integrate quantitative reasoning and skill development is critical to prepare students for careers in modern medicine and scientific research. In this paper, we report on the development, implementation, and assessment of stand-alone modules that integrate quantitative reasoning into introductory biology courses. Modules are designed to improve skills in quantitative numeracy, interpreting data sets using visual tools, and making inferences about biological phenomena using mathematical/statistical models. We also examine demographic/background data that predict student improvement in these skills through exposure to these modules. We carried out pre/postassessment tests across four semesters and used student interviews in one semester to examine how students at different levels approached quantitative problems. We found that students improved in all skills in most semesters, although there was variation in the degree of improvement among skills from semester to semester. One demographic variable, transfer status, stood out as a major predictor of the degree to which students improved (transfer students achieved much lower gains every semester, despite the fact that pretest scores in each focus area were similar between transfer and nontransfer students). We propose that increased exposure to quantitative skill development in biology courses is effective at building competency in quantitative reasoning.

Indexed as

AttitudeBiologyData Interpretation, StatisticalDemographyEducational MeasurementFemaleHumansLearningLogistic ModelsMaleModels, TheoreticalStudentsThinking

Identifiers

PMID27146161
PMCPMC4909336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.