ArticleIntegrative cancer therapies2016
Impact of Anthocyanidins on Mitoxantrone-Induced Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity: An In Vitro and In Vivo Analysis.
Article in Integrative cancer therapies, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inhibition of mitochondrial calcium transporters alters adp-induced platelet responses.Molecular biology reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Procaine Induces Epigenetic Changes in HCT116 Colon Cancer Cells.Genetics research international · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypothesis Anthocyanins possess well-known biological effects and suppress DNA damage induced by therapeutic topoisomerase poisons. Our study focusses on the modulatory effects of anthocyanidins-malvidin (MAL) and pelargonidin (PEL)-on topoisomerase II poison mitoxantrone (MXT)-induced cytotoxicity and genotoxicity in in vitro and in vivo conditions. Study design HepG2 cells were treated with MXT (1-10 µM), MAL (10-100 µM,) and PEL (5-640 µM) to determine cell viability. Further, experiments on cytotoxicity and apoptosis induction by single agents or combinations were performed. In vitro and in vivo antigenotoxic effect of MAL/PEL against MXT was evaluated in human lymphocytes and mouse bone marrow cells. Methods Cytotoxicity of test agents and apoptosis induction in HepG2 cells was assessed by MTT assay, trypan blue dye exclusion assay and Hoechst 33258 staining. Antigenotoxic effects of MAL/PEL against MXT were assessed in co-treated human lymphocytes and bone marrow from mice that received MXT intraperitoneally 30 minutes post MAL/PEL oral administration Results Dose-dependent cytotoxicity was observed with all 3 test agents in HepG2 cells. Highest test concentration of 100 µM MAL, 640 µM PEL, and 10 µM MXT decreased HepG2 cell viability by 80%, 30%, and 90%, respectively. The combination of 1 µM MXT + 80 µM MAL reduced cell viability better than single agents. MAL/PEL treatment significantly reduced MXT-induced genotoxicity in human lymphocytes and micronuclei formation in mice. Conclusion Combination of MAL/PEL with lower doses of MXT, especially MAL+MXT increases the cytotoxicity in cancer cells. In addition, MXT treatment with MAL/PEL reduced MXT-induced genotoxicity and protected normal cells during chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.