ArticleThe British journal of radiology2016
(18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging in rectal cancer: relationship with the RAS mutational status.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- Standard of practice imaging vs. PET/MR: a comparative prospective study in rectal cancer staging.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Article
- Image Analysis as tool for Predicting Colorectal Cancer Molecular Alterations: A Scoping Review.Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2025Article
- Using tumor habitat-derived radiomic analysis during pretreatmentCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024Article
- Phenomic Imaging.Phenomics (Cham, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- The Role of Radiomics in Rectal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2023Review
- Does high [European radiology · 2023Article
- Radiomics and machine learning analysis by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in colorectal liver metastases prognostic assessment.La Radiologia medica · 2023Article
- Imaging prediction ofThe British journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Ability ofCancers · 2023Article
- Radiomics in colorectal cancer patients.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Review
- Colorectal liver metastases patients prognostic assessment: prospects and limits of radiomics and radiogenomics.Infectious agents and cancer · 2023Review
- Preoperative prediction of lymphovascular invasion of colorectal cancer by radiomics based on 18F-FDG PET-CT and clinical factors.Frontiers in radiology · 2023Article
- Contrast-Enhanced CT Texture Analysis in Colon Cancer: Correlation with Genetic Markers.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2022Article
- The application of radiomics in predicting gene mutations in cancer.European radiology · 2022Review
- Radiomics in Oncological PET Imaging: A Systematic Review-Part 2, Infradiaphragmatic Cancers, Blood Malignancies, Melanoma and Musculoskeletal Cancers.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Correlation betweenAbdominal radiology (New York) · 2022Article
- Overview of serum and tissue markers in colorectal cancer: a primer for radiologists.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2021Review
- Preoperative prediction of regional lymph node metastasis of colorectal cancer based onAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2021Article
- A Systematic Review of PET Textural Analysis and Radiomics in Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- MRI Radiomics Signature as a Potential Biomarker for PredictingFrontiers in oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTreating metastatic colorectal cancer with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies is recommended only for patients whose tumour does not harbour mutations of KRAS or NRAS. The aim of this study was to investigate the biology of rectal cancers and specifically to evaluate the relationship between fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) intensity and heterogeneity parameters and their mutational status.
methods151 patients with newly diagnosed rectal cancer were included in this retrospective study. All patients underwent a baseline (18)F-FDG PET/CT within a median time interval of 27 days of tumour tissue sampling, which was performed before any treatment. Standardized uptake values (SUVs), volume-based parameters and texture analysis were studied. We retrospectively performed KRAS genotyping on codons 12, 13, 61, 117 and 146, NRAS genotyping on codons 12, 13 and 61 and BRAF on codon 600. Associations between PET/CT parameters and the mutational status were assessed using univariate and multivariate analysis.
results83 (55%) patients had an RAS mutation: 74 KRAS and 9 NRAS, while 68 patients had no mutation (wild-type tumours). No patient had BRAF mutation. First-order features based on intensity histogram analysis were significantly associated with RAS mutations: maximum SUV (SUVmax) (p-value = 0.002), mean SUV (p-value = 0.006), skewness (p-value = 0.049), SUV standard deviation (p-value = 0.001) and SUV coefficient of variation (SUVcov) (p-value = 0.001). Both SUVcov and SUVmax showed an area under the curve of 0.65 with sensitivity of 56% and 69%, respectively, and specificity of 64% and 52%, respectively. None of the volume-based (metabolic tumour volume and total lesion glycolysis), nor local or regional textural features were associated with the presence of RAS mutations.
conclusionAlthough rectal cancers with KRAS or NRAS mutations display a significantly higher glucose metabolism than wild-type cancers, the accuracy of the currently proposed quantitative metrics extracted from (18)F-FDG PET/CT is not sufficiently high for playing a meaningful clinical role. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: RAS-mutated rectal cancers have a significantly higher glucose metabolism. However, the accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT quantitative metrics is not as such as the technique could play a clinical role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.