Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27146053›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgery2016

Incisional Hernia Rates After Laparoscopic or Open Abdominal Surgery-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Julia B Kössler-Ebs, Kathrin Grummich, Katrin Jensen, Felix J Hüttner, Beat Müller-Stich, Christoph M Seiler, Phillip Knebel, Markus W Büchler, Markus K Diener

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. The Treatment of Incisional Hernia.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2018
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Julia B Kössler-EbsDepartment of General-, Visceral- and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Kathrin GrummichStudy Center of the German Surgical Society, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Katrin JensenInstitute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Felix J HüttnerDepartment of General-, Visceral- and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Beat Müller-StichDepartment of General-, Visceral- and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christoph M SeilerJosephs-Hospital Warendorf, General-, Visceral- and Vascular Surgery, Am Krankenhaus 2, 48231, Warendorf, Germany.
Phillip KnebelDepartment of General-, Visceral- and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus W BüchlerDepartment of General-, Visceral- and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus K DienerDepartment of General-, Visceral- and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. markus.buechler@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Heidelberg University · DEGerman Society of Surgery · DESt. Joseph-Krankenhaus · DEZimmer Biomet (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncisional hernias are one of the most common long-term complications associated with open abdominal surgery. The aim of this review and meta-analysis was to systematically assess laparoscopic versus open abdominal surgery as a general surgical strategy in all available indications in terms of incisional hernia occurrence.

methodsA systematic literature search was performed to identify randomized controlled trials comparing incisional hernia rates after laparoscopic versus open abdominal surgery in all indications. Random effects meta-analyses were calculated and presented as risk differences (RD) with their corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CI).

results24 trials (3490 patients) were included. Incisional hernias were significantly reduced in the laparoscopic group (RD -0.06, 95 % CI [-0.09, -0.03], p = 0.0002, I (2) = 75). The advantage of the laparoscopic procedure persisted in the subgroup of total-laparoscopic interventions (RD -0.14, 95 % CI [-0.22, -0.06], p = 0.001, I (2) = 87 %), whereas laparoscopically assisted procedures did not show a significant reduction of incisional hernias compared to open surgery (RD -0.01, 95 % CI [-0.03, 0.01], p = 0.31, I (2) = 35 %). Wound infections were significantly reduced in the laparoscopic group (RD -0.06, 95 % CI [-0.09, -0.03], p < 0.0001, I (2) = 35 %); overall postoperative morbidity was comparable in both groups (RD -0.06, 95 % CI [-0.13, 0.00], p = 0.06; I (2) = 64 %). Open abdominal surgery showed a significantly longer hospital stay compared to laparoscopy (RD -1.92, 95 % CI [-2.67, -1.17], p < 0.00001, I (2) = 87 %). At short-term follow-up, quality of life was in favor of laparoscopy.

conclusionsIncisional hernias are less frequent using the total-laparoscopic approach instead of open abdominal surgery. Whenever possible, the less traumatic access should be chosen.

Indexed as

AbdomenHumansIncisional HerniaLaparoscopyPostoperative ComplicationsQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID27146053
OpenAlexW2347043209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.