Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27145875›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of biophysics2016

Computational Methodologies for Real-Space Structural Refinement of Large Macromolecular Complexes.

Boon Chong Goh, Jodi A Hadden, Rafael C Bernardi, Abhishek Singharoy, Ryan McGreevy, Till Rudack, C Keith Cassidy, Klaus Schulten

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of biophysics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Generative AI for computational chemistry: A roadmap to predicting emergent phenomena.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. In-cell Structure and Variability of Pyrenoid Rubisco.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Lessons Learned from Responsive Molecular Dynamics Studies of the COVID-19 Virus.Proceedings of UrgentHPC 2021 : the Third International Workshop on HPC for Urgent Decision Making · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Large-Scale Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Cellular Compartments.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Coronavirus through Delaware's Computational Microscope.Delaware journal of public health · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Boon Chong GohBeckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801.
Jodi A HaddenBeckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801.
Rafael C BernardiBeckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801.
Abhishek SingharoyBeckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801.
Ryan McGreevyBeckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801.
Till RudackBeckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801.
C Keith CassidyBeckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801.
Klaus SchultenBeckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801.

Funding

Synthetic Antigen Binder CoreU54GM087519 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI KOSSIAKOFF, ANTHONY A · 2010 to 2017
$31.9M
WHOLE CELL SIMULATIONP41GM104601 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI TAJKHORSHID, EMAD · 2012 to 2021
$19.0M
System-Level Simulation of a Bioenergetic MembraneR01GM067887 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI TAJKHORSHID, EMAD · 2003 to 2018
$4.0M
Commodity Hardware Acceleration of Popular Modeling Software for Structural BioloR01GM098243 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI SCHULTEN, KLAUS · 2011 to 2014
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM104601NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067887NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM098243NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM087519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rise of the computer as a powerful tool for model building and refinement has revolutionized the field of structure determination for large biomolecular systems. Despite the wide availability of robust experimental methods capable of resolving structural details across a range of spatiotemporal resolutions, computational hybrid methods have the unique ability to integrate the diverse data from multimodal techniques such as X-ray crystallography and electron microscopy into consistent, fully atomistic structures. Here, commonly employed strategies for computational real-space structural refinement are reviewed, and their specific applications are illustrated for several large macromolecular complexes: ribosome, virus capsids, chemosensory array, and photosynthetic chromatophore. The increasingly important role of computational methods in large-scale structural refinement, along with current and future challenges, is discussed.

Indexed as

Bacterial ChromatophoresCapsidCryoelectron MicroscopyCrystallography, X-RayHumansMacromolecular SubstancesModels, MolecularMultiprotein ComplexesRibosomesMacromolecular SubstancesMultiprotein Complexescryo-EMflexible fittinghybrid methodsintegrative modelingmolecular dynamicssimulation

Identifiers

PMID27145875
PMCPMC5526348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.