Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27145858›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

An Evaluation of Blood Compatibility of Silver Nanoparticles.

He Huang, Wenjia Lai, Menghua Cui, Ling Liang, Yuchen Lin, Qiaojun Fang, Ying Liu, Liming Xie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Tackling carbapenem-resistantBiotechnology notes (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. FluorinatedOrganometallics · 2024
    Article

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

He HuangKey Laboratory of Standardization and Measurement for Nanotechnology of Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing 100190, P. R. China.
Wenjia LaiKey Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety of Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing 100190, P. R. China.
Menghua CuiKey Laboratory of Standardization and Measurement for Nanotechnology of Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing 100190, P. R. China.
Ling LiangKey Laboratory of Standardization and Measurement for Nanotechnology of Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing 100190, P. R. China.
Yuchen LinKey Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety of Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing 100190, P. R. China.
Qiaojun FangKey Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety of Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing 100190, P. R. China.
Ying LiuKey Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety of Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing 100190, P. R. China.
Liming XieKey Laboratory of Standardization and Measurement for Nanotechnology of Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing 100190, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have tremendous potentials in medical devices due to their excellent antimicrobial properties. Blood compatibility should be investigated for AgNPs due to the potential blood contact. However, so far, most studies are not systematic and have not provided insights into the mechanisms for blood compatibility of AgNPs. In this study, we have investigated the blood biological effects, including hemolysis, lymphocyte proliferation, platelet aggregation, coagulation and complement activation, of 20 nm AgNPs with two different surface coatings (polyvinyl pyrrolidone and citrate). Our results have revealed AgNPs could elicit hemolysis and severely impact the proliferation and viability of lymphocytes at all investigated concentrations (10, 20, 40 μg/mL). Nevertheless, AgNPs didn't show any effect on platelet aggregation, coagulation process, or complement activation at up to ~40 μg/mL. Proteomic analysis on AgNPs plasma proteins corona has revealed that acidic and small molecular weight blood plasma proteins were preferentially adsorbed onto AgNPs, and these include some important proteins relevant to hemostasis, coagulation, platelet, complement activation and immune responses. The predicted biological effects of AgNPs by proteomic analysis are mostly consistent with our experimental data since there were few C3 components on AgNPs and more negative than positive factors involving platelet aggregation and thrombosis.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsBlood CoagulationBlood ProteinsCell ProliferationCitratesComplement ActivationComputational BiologyErythrocytesGene ExpressionHemolysisHumansLymphocytesMetal NanoparticlesPlatelet AggregationPovidonePrimary Cell CultureAnti-Infective AgentsBlood ProteinsCitratesPovidoneProteomeSilverSodium Citrate

Identifiers

PMID27145858
PMCPMC4857076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.