Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27145807›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2016

Complex intervention modelling should capture the dynamics of adaptation.

James Greenwood-Lee, Penelope Hawe, Alberto Nettel-Aguirre, Alan Shiell, Deborah A Marshall

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Introducing and integrating perinatal mental health screening: Development of an equity-informed evidence-based approach.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

James Greenwood-LeeCentre for Science, Athabasca University, Athabasca, T9S 3A3, Canada. jgreenwoodlee@athabascau.ca.
Penelope HaweMenzies Centre for Health Policy and The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Alberto Nettel-AguirreDepartments of Paediatrics and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, T3B 6A8, Canada.
Alan ShiellSchool of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University and The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Melbourne, 3086, Australia.
Deborah A MarshallDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre · AUAlberta Children's Hospital Research InstituteAthabasca University · CAUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

CIHR 92252
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComplexity has been linked to health interventions in two ways: first as a property of the intervention, and secondly as a property of the system into which the intervention is implemented. The former recognizes that interventions may consist of multiple components that act both independently and interdependently, making it difficult to identify the components or combinations of components (and their contexts) that are important mechanisms of change. The latter recognizes that interventions are implemented in complex adaptive systems comprised of intelligent agents who modify their behaviour (including any actions required to implement the intervention) in an effort to improve outcomes relative to their own perspective and objectives. Although an intervention may be intended to take a particular form, its implementation and impact within the system may deviate from its original intentions as a result of adaptation. Complexity highlights the challenge in developing interventions as effective health solutions. The UK Medical Research Council provides guidelines on the development and evaluation of complex interventions. While mathematical modelling is included in the guidelines, there is potential for mathematical modeling to play a greater role. DISCUSSION: The dynamic non-linear nature of complex adaptive systems makes mathematical modelling crucial. However, the tendency is for models of interventions to limit focus on the ecology of the system - the 'real-time' operation of the system and impacts of the intervention. These models are deficient by not modelling the way the system reacts to the intervention via agent adaptation. Complex intervention modelling needs to capture the consequences of adaptation through the inclusion of an evolutionary dynamic to describe the long-term emergent outcomes that result as agents respond to the ecological changes introduced by intervention in an effort to produce better outcomes for themselves. Mathematical approaches such as those found in economics in evolutionary game theory and mechanism design can inform the design and evaluation of health interventions. As an illustration, the introduction of a central screening clinic is modeled as an example of a health services delivery intervention. Complexity necessitates a greater role for mathematical models, especially those that capture the dynamics of human actions and interactions.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHumansMass ScreeningNonlinear DynamicsComplex adaptive systemsComplex interventionIntervention studiesModelingNon-linear dynamics

Identifiers

PMID27145807
PMCPMC4855763
OpenAlexW2345521921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.