Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27145540›Full record

ReviewMicrobial biotechnology2017

Whole cell biocatalysts: essential workers from Nature to the industry.

Carla C C R de Carvalho

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbial biotechnology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed
13.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 275 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Production of flavonoidPlant biotechnology (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Integrated biosynthesis of the lignan (-)-pluviatolide in resting and growingFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carla C C R de CarvalhoiBB-Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, Department of Bioengineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, Lisbon, 1049-001, Portugal.
Institute for Biotechnology and Bioengineering · PT

Funding

HIV/AIDS Prevention Practitioner InstituteR43AI058389 · NIAID · SOCIOMETRICS CORPORATION · PI CARD, JOSEFINA JAYME · 2004 to 2004
$247k
NIAID NIH HHS R43 AI058389
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microorganisms have been exposed to a myriad of substrates and environmental conditions throughout evolution resulting in countless metabolites and enzymatic activities. Although mankind have been using these properties for centuries, we have only recently learned to control their production, to develop new biocatalysts with high stability and productivity and to improve their yields under new operational conditions. However, microbial cells still provide the best known environment for enzymes, preventing conformational changes in the protein structure in non-conventional medium and under harsh reaction conditions, while being able to efficiently regenerate necessary cofactors and to carry out cascades of reactions. Besides, a still unknown microbe is probably already producing a compound that will cure cancer, Alzeihmer's disease or kill the most resistant pathogen. In this review, the latest developments in screening desirable activities and improving production yields are discussed.

Indexed as

EnzymesIndustrial MicrobiologyBacteriaBiological ProductsFungiBiological ProductsEnzymes

Identifiers

PMID27145540
PMCPMC5328830
OpenAlexW2345952257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.