The use of public health infrastructure probably the best strategy for national and large-scale naloxone distribution programmes.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. The implementation of take-home naloxone: Lessons learned from a 3-year take-home naloxone project in Germany.Harm reduction journal · 2025
   Article
2. What lessons from Norway's experience could be applied in the United States in response to the addiction and overdose crisis?Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2022
   Article
3. Protocol for a multi-site study of the effects of overdose prevention education with naloxone distribution program in Skåne County, Sweden.BMC psychiatry · 2020
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Effectiveness of Scotland's National Naloxone Programme for reducing opioid-related deaths: a before (2006-10) versus after (2011-13) comparison.2016

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as