Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27145472›Full record

SynthesisHuman brain mapping2016

Toward a cumulative science of functional integration: A meta-analysis of psychophysiological interactions.

David V Smith, Mouad Gseir, Megan E Speer, Mauricio R Delgado

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Human brain mapping, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Connectivity analyses for task-based fMRI.Physics of life reviews · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David V SmithDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey.
Mouad GseirDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey.
Megan E SpeerDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey.
Mauricio R DelgadoDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey.

Funding

Neural mechanisms of avoidance learning and active coping via emotion regulationR01DA027764 · NIDA · RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ NEWARK · PI DELGADO, MAURICIO R. · 2009 to 2016
$2.2M
Parsing Reward: Identifying Distinct Neural Pathways for Specific Reward PropertiesF32MH107175 · NIMH · RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ NEWARK · PI SMITH, DAVID VICTOR · 2015 to 2016
$100k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA027764NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH107175
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much of the work in cognitive neuroscience is shifting from a focus on single brain regions to a focus on the connectivity between multiple brain regions. These inter-regional connectivity patterns contribute to a wide range of behaviors and are studied with models of functional integration. The rapid expansion of the literature on functional integration offers an opportunity to scrutinize the consistency and specificity of one of the most popular approaches for quantifying connectivity: psychophysiological interaction (PPI) analysis. We performed coordinate-based meta-analyses on 284 PPI studies, which allowed us to test (a) whether those studies consistently converge on similar target regions and (b) whether the identified target regions are specific to the chosen seed region and psychological context. Our analyses revealed two key results. First, we found that different types of PPI studies-e.g., those using seeds such as amygdala and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and contexts such as emotion and cognitive control, respectively-each consistently converge on similar target regions, thus supporting the reliability of PPI as a tool for studying functional integration. Second, we also found target regions that were specific to the chosen seed region and psychological context, indicating distinct patterns of brain connectivity. For example, the DLPFC seed reliably contributed to a posterior cingulate cortex target during cognitive control but contributed to an amygdala target in other contexts. Our results point to the robustness of PPI while highlighting common and distinct patterns of functional integration, potentially advancing models of brain connectivity. Hum Brain Mapp 37:2904-2917, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

BrainHumansNeural PathwaysPsychophysiologybrain connectivityCBMAcoordinate-based meta-analysiscouplingeffective connectivityfMRI

Identifiers

PMID27145472
PMCPMC4945436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.