Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27145448›Full record

ArticleClinical oral implants research2017

Pre-augmentation soft tissue expansion improves scaffold-based vertical bone regeneration - a randomized study in dogs.

Doğan Kaner, Han Zhao, Wolfgang Arnold, Hendrik Terheyden, Anton Friedmann

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral implants research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Clinical and histological evaluation of three-dimensional printing individualized titanium mesh for alveolar bone defect repair].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Animal models of vertical bone augmentation (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Doğan KanerDepartment of Periodontology, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.
Han ZhaoDepartment of Periodontology, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.
Wolfgang ArnoldDepartment of Oral Biology and Materials Science, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.
Hendrik TerheydenDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Rotes-Kreuz-Krankenhaus Kassel, Kassel, Germany.
Anton FriedmannDepartment of Periodontology, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.
Witten/Herdecke University · DEBeijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital · CNMarienkrankenhaus Kassel · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSoft tissue (ST) dehiscence with graft exposure is a frequent complication of vertical augmentation. Flap dehiscence is caused by failure to achieve tension-free primary wound closure and by the impairment of flap microcirculation due to surgical trauma. Soft tissue expansion (STE) increases ST quality and quantity prior to reconstructive surgery. We hypothesized that flap preconditioning using STE would reduce the incidence of ST complications after bone augmentation and that optimized ST healing would improve the outcome of bone regeneration. MATERIALS AND

methodsSelf-filling tissue expanders were implanted in mandibular bone defects in ten beagle dogs. After expansion, alloplastic scaffolds were placed for vertical bone augmentation in STE sites and in control sites without STE pre-treatment. ST flap microcirculation was analysed using laser Doppler flowmetry. The incidence of graft exposures was evaluated after 2 weeks. Bone formation was assessed after 2 months, using histomorphometry and immunohistochemistry.

resultsTest sites showed significantly less impairment of perfusion and faster recovery of microcirculation after bone augmentation. Furthermore, no flap dehiscences occurred in STE sites. Bone regeneration was found in both groups; however, significantly greater formation of new bone was detected in test sites with preceding STE.

conclusionsPreconditioning using STE improved ST healing and bone formation after vertical augmentation. The combination of STE and the subsequent placement of alloplastic scaffolds may facilitate the reconstruction of severe bone defects.

Indexed as

Bone RegenerationTissue ExpansionAlveolar Ridge AugmentationAnimalsDogsMaleModels, AnimalRandom AllocationTissue Expansion Devicesanimal experimentsbiomaterialsbone regenerationguided tissue regenerationsurgical techniqueswound healing

Identifiers

PMID27145448
PMCPMC5484302
OpenAlexW2345595304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.