Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27145395›Full record

ArticleACS chemical neuroscience2016

Impaired Brain Dopamine and Serotonin Release and Uptake in Wistar Rats Following Treatment with Carboplatin.

Sam V Kaplan, Ryan A Limbocker, Rachel C Gehringer, Jenny L Divis, Gregory L Osterhaus, Maxwell D Newby, Michael J Sofis, David P Jarmolowicz, Brooke D Newman, Tiffany A Mathews and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS chemical neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Cancer therapy and cachexia.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Caged ZnACS chemical neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Mechanisms of Chemotherapy-Induced Neurotoxicity.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sam V Kaplan
Ryan A Limbocker
Rachel C Gehringer
Jenny L Divis
Gregory L Osterhaus
Maxwell D Newby
Michael J Sofis
David P Jarmolowicz
Brooke D NewmanDepartment of Chemistry, Wayne State University , Detroit, Michigan 48202 United States.
Tiffany A MathewsDepartment of Chemistry, Wayne State University , Detroit, Michigan 48202 United States.
Michael A Johnson
Wayne State University · US

Funding

Understanding the mechanobiology of stem cells in a microengineered 3D cardiac tissue environment with cardiomyopathyP20GM103638 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI HOLMSTROM, ERIK D · 2012 to 2021
$22.1M
Methods for Measuring Sub-second Neurotransmitter InteractionsR21NS077485 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI JOHNSON, MICHAEL A. · 2012 to 2013
$396k
national institue of general medical sciences P20GM103638-02NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103638NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS077485
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment, known also as "chemobrain", is a medical complication of cancer treatment that is characterized by a general decline in cognition affecting visual and verbal memory, attention, complex problem solving skills, and motor function. It is estimated that one-third of patients who undergo chemotherapy treatment will experience cognitive impairment. Alterations in the release and uptake of dopamine and serotonin, central nervous system neurotransmitters that play important roles in cognition, could potentially contribute to impaired intellectual performance in those impacted by chemobrain. To investigate how chemotherapy treatment affects these systems, fast-scan cyclic voltammetry (FSCV) at carbon-fiber microelectrodes was used to measure dopamine and serotonin release and uptake in coronal brain slices containing the striatum and dorsal raphe nucleus, respectively. Measurements were taken from rats treated weekly with selected doses of carboplatin and from control rats treated with saline. Modeling the stimulated dopamine release plots revealed an impairment of dopamine release per stimulus pulse (80% of saline control at 5 mg/kg and 58% at 20 mg/kg) after 4 weeks of carboplatin treatment. Moreover, Vmax, the maximum uptake rate of dopamine, was also decreased (55% of saline control at 5 mg/kg and 57% at 20 mg/kg). Nevertheless, overall dopamine content, measured in striatal brain lysates by high performance liquid chromatography, and reserve pool dopamine, measured by FSCV after pharmacological manipulation, did not significantly change, suggesting that chemotherapy treatment selectively impairs the dopamine release and uptake processes. Similarly, serotonin release upon electrical stimulation was impaired (45% of saline control at 20 mg/kg). Measurements of spatial learning discrimination were taken throughout the treatment period and carboplatin was found to alter cognition. These studies support the need for additional neurochemical and behavioral analyses to identify the underlying mechanisms of chemotherapy-induced cognitive disorders.

Indexed as

Electric StimulationAnimalsCarbonCarbon FiberCarboplatinCorpus StriatumDopamineElectrochemical TechniquesMaleNeurotransmitter AgentsRats, WistarSerotoninCarbonCarbon FiberCarboplatinDopamineNeurotransmitter AgentsSerotoninCarboplatinchemobrainchemotherapydopaminefast-scan cyclic voltammetryreserve poolserotonin

Identifiers

PMID27145395
PMCPMC4911621
OpenAlexW2345706448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.