Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2016
R- and S-citalopram concentrations have differential effects on neuropsychiatric scores in elders with dementia and agitation.
Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative efficacy and safety of antidepressant therapy for the agitation of dementia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Pooled it
- Escitalopram for agitation in Alzheimer's dementia: a randomized controlled phase 3 trial.Nature medicine · 2025Trial
- R- and S-citalopram concentrations have differential effects on neuropsychiatric scores in elders with dementia and agitation.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2016Trial
- Application of escitalopram population pharmacokinetic repository: a step to precision dosing.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- Neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer's disease: Past, present, and future.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Emerging Pharmacological Approaches for Psychosis and Agitation in Alzheimer's Disease.CNS drugs · 2025Review
- Potential drugs for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2023Review
- Escitalopram Personalized Dosing: A Population Pharmacokinetics Repository Method.Drug design, development and therapy · 2023Review
- New Possibilities in the Therapeutic Approach to Alzheimer's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Serotonin 2 Receptors, Agomelatine, and Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia in Alzheimer's Disease.Behavioural neurology · 2021Review
- Marine Natural Products, Multitarget Therapy and Repurposed Agents in Alzheimer's Disease.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Agitation and impulsivity in mid and late life as possible risk markers for incident dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.) · 2020Review
- Escitalopram for agitation in Alzheimer's disease (S-CitAD): Methods and design of an investigator-initiated, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2019Article
- Management of Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia.Current psychiatry reports · 2019Review
- Current Agents in Development for Treating Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms Associated with Dementia.Drugs & aging · 2019Review
- Identifying Better Outcome Measures to Improve Treatment of Agitation in Dementia: A Report from the EU/US/CTAD Task Force.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2018Article
- Dementia-related agitation: a review of non-pharmacological interventions and analysis of risks and benefits of pharmacotherapy.Translational psychiatry · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThe aim was to determine the relationship between (R) and (S)-citalopram enantiomer exposure (AUC(0,24 h)) and therapeutic response in agitated individuals greater than 60 years old with Alzheimer's dementia (AD).
methodsCitalopram enantiomer exposures (AUC(0,24 h)) derived from an established population pharmacokinetic analysis were utilized to explore the relationship between (R)- and (S)-citalopram area under the curve (AUC(0,24 )) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Neurobehavioural Rating Scale-Agitation Subscale (NBRS-A), modified Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change (mADCS-CGIC) and Neuropsychiatric Inventory Agitation subscale (NPIA) scores. Time dependent changes in these scores (disease progression) were accounted for prior to exploring the exposure effect relationship for each enantiomer. These relationships were evaluated using a non-linear-mixed effects modelling approach as implemented in nonmem v7.3.
results(S)-AUC(0,24 h) and (R)-AUC(0,24 h) each contributed to improvement in NBRS-A scores (k3(R) -0.502; k4(S) -0.712) as did time in treatment. However, increasing (R)-AUC(0,24 h) decreased the probability of patient response (maximum Δ -0.182%/AUC(0,24 h)) based on the CGIC while (S)-AUC(0,24 h) improved the probability of response (maximum Δ 0.112%/AUC(0,24 h)). (R)-AUC(0,24 h) was also associated with worsening in MMSE scores (-0.5 points).
conclusionsOur results suggest that citalopram enantiomers contributed differentially to treatment outcomes. (R)-citalopram accounted for a greater proportion of the adverse consequences associated with racemic citalopram treatment in patients with AD including a decreased probability of treatment response as measured by the CGIC and a reduction in MMSE scores. The S-enantiomer was associated with increased probability of response based on the CGIC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.