Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27145341›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2016

Identifying Network Perturbation in Cancer.

Maxim Grechkin, Benjamin A Logsdon, Andrew J Gentles, Su-In Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Integrative Computational Framework,bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Differential gene regulatory networks in development and disease.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maxim GrechkinDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2265-3881
Benjamin A LogsdonSage Bionetworks, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Andrew J GentlesCenter for Cancer Systems Biology, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Su-In LeeDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
University of Washington · USCenter for Systems Biology · USSage Bionetworks · US

Funding

MODELING THE ROLE OF PROGRESSION IN FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMAU54CA149145 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PLEVRITIS, SYLVIA KATINA · 2010 to 2014
$12.1M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA149145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a computational framework, called DISCERN (DIfferential SparsE Regulatory Network), to identify informative topological changes in gene-regulator dependence networks inferred on the basis of mRNA expression datasets within distinct biological states. DISCERN takes two expression datasets as input: an expression dataset of diseased tissues from patients with a disease of interest and another expression dataset from matching normal tissues. DISCERN estimates the extent to which each gene is perturbed-having distinct regulator connectivity in the inferred gene-regulator dependencies between the disease and normal conditions. This approach has distinct advantages over existing methods. First, DISCERN infers conditional dependencies between candidate regulators and genes, where conditional dependence relationships discriminate the evidence for direct interactions from indirect interactions more precisely than pairwise correlation. Second, DISCERN uses a new likelihood-based scoring function to alleviate concerns about accuracy of the specific edges inferred in a particular network. DISCERN identifies perturbed genes more accurately in synthetic data than existing methods to identify perturbed genes between distinct states. In expression datasets from patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), breast cancer and lung cancer, genes with high DISCERN scores in each cancer are enriched for known tumor drivers, genes associated with the biological processes known to be important in the disease, and genes associated with patient prognosis, in the respective cancer. Finally, we show that DISCERN can uncover potential mechanisms underlying network perturbation by explaining observed epigenomic activity patterns in cancer and normal tissue types more accurately than alternative methods, based on the available epigenomic data from the ENCODE project.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksModels, GeneticBreast NeoplasmsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationDatabases, GeneticEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteLikelihood FunctionsLung NeoplasmsNeoplasmsPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID27145341
PMCPMC4856318
OpenAlexW2347110697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.