ArticlePLoS computational biology2016
Identifying Network Perturbation in Cancer.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- CancerHubs Data Explorer: a web application for investigating mutation-enriched protein interaction hubs in human cancers.BioData mining · 2026Article
- A powerful framework for differential co-expression analysis of general risk factors.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- The Atlas of Protein-Protein Interactions in Cancer (APPIC)-a webtool to visualize and analyze cancer subtypes.NAR cancer · 2025Article
- CancerHubs: a systematic data mining and elaboration approach for identifying novel cancer-related protein interaction hubs.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Integrative Computational Framework,bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- WMDS.net: a network control framework for identifying key players in transcriptome programs.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Review
- Computational systems biology in disease modeling and control, review and perspectives.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2022Review
- Network-based protein-protein interaction prediction method maps perturbations of cancer interactome.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- Inferring Differential Networks by Integrating Gene Expression Data With Additional Knowledge.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- DNF: A differential network flow method to identify rewiring drivers for gene regulatory networks.Neurocomputing · 2020Article
- SCNrank: spectral clustering for network-based ranking to reveal potential drug targets and its application in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.BMC medical genomics · 2020Article
- SourceSet: A graphical model approach to identify primary genes in perturbed biological pathways.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Identifying and ranking potential driver genes of Alzheimer's disease using multiview evidence aggregation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- Dramatic dysbalancing of the Wnt pathway in breast cancers.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Differential gene regulatory networks in development and disease.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2018Review
- Integrated DNA methylome and transcriptome analysis reveals the ethylene-induced flowering pathway genes in pineapple.Scientific reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We present a computational framework, called DISCERN (DIfferential SparsE Regulatory Network), to identify informative topological changes in gene-regulator dependence networks inferred on the basis of mRNA expression datasets within distinct biological states. DISCERN takes two expression datasets as input: an expression dataset of diseased tissues from patients with a disease of interest and another expression dataset from matching normal tissues. DISCERN estimates the extent to which each gene is perturbed-having distinct regulator connectivity in the inferred gene-regulator dependencies between the disease and normal conditions. This approach has distinct advantages over existing methods. First, DISCERN infers conditional dependencies between candidate regulators and genes, where conditional dependence relationships discriminate the evidence for direct interactions from indirect interactions more precisely than pairwise correlation. Second, DISCERN uses a new likelihood-based scoring function to alleviate concerns about accuracy of the specific edges inferred in a particular network. DISCERN identifies perturbed genes more accurately in synthetic data than existing methods to identify perturbed genes between distinct states. In expression datasets from patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), breast cancer and lung cancer, genes with high DISCERN scores in each cancer are enriched for known tumor drivers, genes associated with the biological processes known to be important in the disease, and genes associated with patient prognosis, in the respective cancer. Finally, we show that DISCERN can uncover potential mechanisms underlying network perturbation by explaining observed epigenomic activity patterns in cancer and normal tissue types more accurately than alternative methods, based on the available epigenomic data from the ENCODE project.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.